Stakeholder contestations of water quality use and management in the Vaal Barrage catchment
- Odume, Oghenekaro N, Chili, Asanda, Nnadozie, Chika F, Slaughter, Andrew R
- Authors: Odume, Oghenekaro N , Chili, Asanda , Nnadozie, Chika F , Slaughter, Andrew R
- Date: 2024
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/480606 , vital:78459 , https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-sajsci-v120-n9-a18
- Description: The water resources within the lower section of the Upper Vaal catchment, where the Vaal Barrage is situated, are highly utilised and developed, and water quality regulation has become a contested space between resource users and the regulators. The credibility and scientific defensibility of discharge standards in water-use licences (WULs), the relationship between upstream and downstream waste loads, the relationship between flows and water quality standards in WUL, and the water quality components of the resource quality objectives (RQOs) are being contested. This study explores the perceptions and motivations underlying these contestations as a contribution to scientific understanding of water quality management in a highly developed system. Perceived unrealistic RQOs, perceived lack of scientific credibility of the methods for deriving water quality standards in WUL, data inadequacy, as well as poor institutional capacity were identified as the top motivations for contesting applicable regulatory instruments in the catchment. Punitive measures, incentives, and education and awareness-raising were identified as key to accelerating compliance. Overall, this paper contributes to our general understanding of the intricacies of water quality management within a contested space.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2024
- Authors: Odume, Oghenekaro N , Chili, Asanda , Nnadozie, Chika F , Slaughter, Andrew R
- Date: 2024
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/480606 , vital:78459 , https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-sajsci-v120-n9-a18
- Description: The water resources within the lower section of the Upper Vaal catchment, where the Vaal Barrage is situated, are highly utilised and developed, and water quality regulation has become a contested space between resource users and the regulators. The credibility and scientific defensibility of discharge standards in water-use licences (WULs), the relationship between upstream and downstream waste loads, the relationship between flows and water quality standards in WUL, and the water quality components of the resource quality objectives (RQOs) are being contested. This study explores the perceptions and motivations underlying these contestations as a contribution to scientific understanding of water quality management in a highly developed system. Perceived unrealistic RQOs, perceived lack of scientific credibility of the methods for deriving water quality standards in WUL, data inadequacy, as well as poor institutional capacity were identified as the top motivations for contesting applicable regulatory instruments in the catchment. Punitive measures, incentives, and education and awareness-raising were identified as key to accelerating compliance. Overall, this paper contributes to our general understanding of the intricacies of water quality management within a contested space.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2024
Case Study For Linking Water Quality License Conditions With Resource Quality Objectives For The Leeutaaiboschspruit Industrial Complex Situated Within The Vaal Barrage Catchment Volume 1
- Odume, Oghenekaro N, Slaughter, Andrew R, Griffin, Neil J, Chili, Asanda
- Authors: Odume, Oghenekaro N , Slaughter, Andrew R , Griffin, Neil J , Chili, Asanda
- Date: 2021
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , report
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/438074 , vital:73433 , ISBN 978-0-6392-0224-2 , https://wrcwebsite.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/TT 838-1 final web.pdf
- Description: In South Africa, the resource-directed measures (RDM) and the source-directed con-trols (SDC) are the two complementary strategies designed to ensure that water resources are used and protected. The RDM are directed at water resources to en-sure their protection, and include the Water Resource Classification System (WRCS), the classification of every significant water resource, the determination of the re-serve and the setting of resource quality objectives (RQOs). On the other hand, the SDC are measures imposed to restrict and control the use of water resources, not only in terms of ensuring water resource protection, but also in terms of ensuring that water resources are equitably allocated and are used efficiently. Water use li-cencing (WUL) is an example of an SDC instrument.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2021
- Authors: Odume, Oghenekaro N , Slaughter, Andrew R , Griffin, Neil J , Chili, Asanda
- Date: 2021
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , report
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/438074 , vital:73433 , ISBN 978-0-6392-0224-2 , https://wrcwebsite.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/TT 838-1 final web.pdf
- Description: In South Africa, the resource-directed measures (RDM) and the source-directed con-trols (SDC) are the two complementary strategies designed to ensure that water resources are used and protected. The RDM are directed at water resources to en-sure their protection, and include the Water Resource Classification System (WRCS), the classification of every significant water resource, the determination of the re-serve and the setting of resource quality objectives (RQOs). On the other hand, the SDC are measures imposed to restrict and control the use of water resources, not only in terms of ensuring water resource protection, but also in terms of ensuring that water resources are equitably allocated and are used efficiently. Water use li-cencing (WUL) is an example of an SDC instrument.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2021
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »