Determinants of smallholder vegetable farmers' participation on post-harvest practices and market access : evidence from Mashonaland East Province of Zimbabwe
- Authors: Mukarumbwa, Peter
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Farms, Small -- Zimbabwe Vegetables -- Zimbabwe -- Marketing Vegetable trade -- Zimbabwe
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/8703 , vital:33431
- Description: Smallholder vegetable production is very vital in enhancing livelihoods in Zimbabwe’s rural areas. Vegetable production generates household income and improves household food security. Despite this, smallholder vegetable farmers in Zimbabwe suffer huge post-harvest losses which reduce their profits and market competiveness. Post-harvest losses of vegetables are a major dilemma faced by smallholder farmers. They not only represent waste of scare resources such as farm inputs but they also entail wasted investment in terms of time, human effort and food. Furthermore, there are also a myriad of other challenges which constrain smallholder vegetable farmers in Zimbabwe from accessing lucrative markets. The broad objective of the study was to assess smallholder vegetable farmers` preferred post-harvest practices for value addition as well as factors that condition their selection choices, adoption and product market access. The study was conducted in four districts: Seke, Goromonzi, Murehwa and Mutoko, in the Mashonaland East Province of Zimbabwe. A multistage sampling procedure was adopted in the selection of villages and households. A total of 385 smallholder vegetable farmers were interviewed. The survey was undertaken from August–October 2016. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of households that were sampled in Mashonaland East Province. Age of household head, gender, educational level, household size, farming experience, main sources of income, land ownership, main vegetables produced and main causes of post-harvest losses were some of the statistics that were analysed. The average age of the farmers varied significantly across districts and it was generally high (average of 50 years). Moreover, the average household size was about six (6) individuals, which is an indication of high dependency ratio. The study also revealed the major causes of post-harvest losses across all vegetables predominantly cultivated in the study area were pests and diseases, followed by decay. Most of the underlying causes of huge post-harvest losses were within the control of the farmer. Therefore, the study recommends strategies from policymakers and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) which enhance post-harvest management. These can result in substantial reduction in losses which can increase farmers’ income without necessarily expanding land under cultivation. The Poisson count regression model (PCRM) was used to analyse factors influencing number of post-harvest techniques adopted by smallholder vegetable farmers in the study area. The results of the PCRM revealed that the following variables were significant in influencing number of post-harvest practices adopted by smallholder vegetable growers: gender, education level, household size, age, farming experience, distance to market, market information, group membership, credit, and hired labour. The study recommends concerted efforts through public private partnerships (PPP) to provide active extension about post-harvest education. This will promote the adoption of simple, uncomplicated and innovative low-cost technologies for post-harvest management. The binary logit model was employed to analyse factors that influence smallholder vegetable farmers’ decisions to select a specific post-harvest practice for value addition. This was based on the three major post-harvest practices which were mainly being adopted by smallholder vegetable farmers’ in the study area which were drying, grading and washing. The results of the binary model showed that nine (9) variables were significant in influencing smallholder vegetable farmers’ decisions to select post-harvest practice for value addition. These were: gender, land size, distance to market, market information, family labour, training, target market, quantity produced and storage facilities. Policymakers and other stakeholders need to provide productive resources such as inputs to improve productivity and ultimately selection of basic post-harvest management techniques along the vegetable supply chain. The multinomial logit model was used in the study to analyse factors that influence market channel choice of smallholder vegetable farmers in the study area. The results from the multinomial logistic regression model revealed that distance to market, group membership, adding value, road infrastructure and quantity produced influenced participation in informal markets. On the other hand, gender, distance to market, market information, group membership, producer price, adding value, road infrastructure, quantity produced and market infrastructure influenced farmers’ participation in formal markets. Policies aimed at assisting resources for improved productivity of vegetables should be gender sensitive. Establishment of irrigation schemes as well as provision of credit for smallholder vegetable production are vital interventions. In the same way, crafting of appropriate policies and programmes which foster collective action amongst smallholder vegetable farmers are required. This will enable them to produce larger volumes as well as participate in more lucrative markets. Finally, smallholder vegetable farmers’ transaction costs can be reduced by investment in infrastructure such as roads.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Mukarumbwa, Peter
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Farms, Small -- Zimbabwe Vegetables -- Zimbabwe -- Marketing Vegetable trade -- Zimbabwe
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/8703 , vital:33431
- Description: Smallholder vegetable production is very vital in enhancing livelihoods in Zimbabwe’s rural areas. Vegetable production generates household income and improves household food security. Despite this, smallholder vegetable farmers in Zimbabwe suffer huge post-harvest losses which reduce their profits and market competiveness. Post-harvest losses of vegetables are a major dilemma faced by smallholder farmers. They not only represent waste of scare resources such as farm inputs but they also entail wasted investment in terms of time, human effort and food. Furthermore, there are also a myriad of other challenges which constrain smallholder vegetable farmers in Zimbabwe from accessing lucrative markets. The broad objective of the study was to assess smallholder vegetable farmers` preferred post-harvest practices for value addition as well as factors that condition their selection choices, adoption and product market access. The study was conducted in four districts: Seke, Goromonzi, Murehwa and Mutoko, in the Mashonaland East Province of Zimbabwe. A multistage sampling procedure was adopted in the selection of villages and households. A total of 385 smallholder vegetable farmers were interviewed. The survey was undertaken from August–October 2016. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of households that were sampled in Mashonaland East Province. Age of household head, gender, educational level, household size, farming experience, main sources of income, land ownership, main vegetables produced and main causes of post-harvest losses were some of the statistics that were analysed. The average age of the farmers varied significantly across districts and it was generally high (average of 50 years). Moreover, the average household size was about six (6) individuals, which is an indication of high dependency ratio. The study also revealed the major causes of post-harvest losses across all vegetables predominantly cultivated in the study area were pests and diseases, followed by decay. Most of the underlying causes of huge post-harvest losses were within the control of the farmer. Therefore, the study recommends strategies from policymakers and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) which enhance post-harvest management. These can result in substantial reduction in losses which can increase farmers’ income without necessarily expanding land under cultivation. The Poisson count regression model (PCRM) was used to analyse factors influencing number of post-harvest techniques adopted by smallholder vegetable farmers in the study area. The results of the PCRM revealed that the following variables were significant in influencing number of post-harvest practices adopted by smallholder vegetable growers: gender, education level, household size, age, farming experience, distance to market, market information, group membership, credit, and hired labour. The study recommends concerted efforts through public private partnerships (PPP) to provide active extension about post-harvest education. This will promote the adoption of simple, uncomplicated and innovative low-cost technologies for post-harvest management. The binary logit model was employed to analyse factors that influence smallholder vegetable farmers’ decisions to select a specific post-harvest practice for value addition. This was based on the three major post-harvest practices which were mainly being adopted by smallholder vegetable farmers’ in the study area which were drying, grading and washing. The results of the binary model showed that nine (9) variables were significant in influencing smallholder vegetable farmers’ decisions to select post-harvest practice for value addition. These were: gender, land size, distance to market, market information, family labour, training, target market, quantity produced and storage facilities. Policymakers and other stakeholders need to provide productive resources such as inputs to improve productivity and ultimately selection of basic post-harvest management techniques along the vegetable supply chain. The multinomial logit model was used in the study to analyse factors that influence market channel choice of smallholder vegetable farmers in the study area. The results from the multinomial logistic regression model revealed that distance to market, group membership, adding value, road infrastructure and quantity produced influenced participation in informal markets. On the other hand, gender, distance to market, market information, group membership, producer price, adding value, road infrastructure, quantity produced and market infrastructure influenced farmers’ participation in formal markets. Policies aimed at assisting resources for improved productivity of vegetables should be gender sensitive. Establishment of irrigation schemes as well as provision of credit for smallholder vegetable production are vital interventions. In the same way, crafting of appropriate policies and programmes which foster collective action amongst smallholder vegetable farmers are required. This will enable them to produce larger volumes as well as participate in more lucrative markets. Finally, smallholder vegetable farmers’ transaction costs can be reduced by investment in infrastructure such as roads.
- Full Text:
Psychological capital and emotional intelligence as moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour among graduate employees in Nigeria
- Authors: Aderibigbe, John Kolawole
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Psychology, Industrial Emotional intelligence
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/8642 , vital:33250
- Description: The study investigated psychological capital and emotional intelligence as moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour among graduate employees in Nigeria, using the explanatory cross-sectional (survey) research design and three sampling techniques (The Two-stage Cluster Sampling Method, The Convenience Sampling Method and The Purposive Sampling Technique) to sample 1532 male and female graduate employees in Nigeria. A structured validated questionnaire was used to collect data from the respondents. Six hypotheses were stated and tested in the study towards propounding a model, using Pearson Correlation Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. The results show that there is a weak positive relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, r = 0.070, p<0.01; there is a significant positive relationship between psychological capital and organisational citizenship behaviour, r = 0.588, p<0.01; there is a significant positive relationship between emotional intelligence and organisational citizenship behaviour, r = 0.473, p<0.01; psychological capital is a significant moderator of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, F (2,1529) = 8.514; R2= 0.011; p <.05; emotional intelligence is a significant moderator of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, F (2,1529) = 5.945; R2= 0.008; p <.05; psychological capital and emotional intelligence are significant joint moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, F (1,1530) = 221.240; R2= 0.186; p <.05; psychological capital has a direct and significant positive effect on organisational citizenship behaviour, R= 0.657, p<.001; emotional intelligence has a direct and significant positive effect on organisational citizenship behaviour, R= 0.183, p<.001; psychological capital has a direct and significant positive effect on occupational stress, R= 0.100, p<.001; emotional intelligence has a direct and significant positive effect on psychological capital, R= 0.547, p<.001. Based on the results, the study concludes that psychological capital and emotional intelligence are significant joint moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour. The proposed model was, therefore, empirically confirmed. The researcher recommends that the empirical model of effective management of occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, which has been propounded in the study, should be adopted and applied by teachers, lecturers, seminar facilitators, workshop trainers, supervisors and managers during their coaching or training sessions.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Aderibigbe, John Kolawole
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Psychology, Industrial Emotional intelligence
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/8642 , vital:33250
- Description: The study investigated psychological capital and emotional intelligence as moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour among graduate employees in Nigeria, using the explanatory cross-sectional (survey) research design and three sampling techniques (The Two-stage Cluster Sampling Method, The Convenience Sampling Method and The Purposive Sampling Technique) to sample 1532 male and female graduate employees in Nigeria. A structured validated questionnaire was used to collect data from the respondents. Six hypotheses were stated and tested in the study towards propounding a model, using Pearson Correlation Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. The results show that there is a weak positive relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, r = 0.070, p<0.01; there is a significant positive relationship between psychological capital and organisational citizenship behaviour, r = 0.588, p<0.01; there is a significant positive relationship between emotional intelligence and organisational citizenship behaviour, r = 0.473, p<0.01; psychological capital is a significant moderator of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, F (2,1529) = 8.514; R2= 0.011; p <.05; emotional intelligence is a significant moderator of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, F (2,1529) = 5.945; R2= 0.008; p <.05; psychological capital and emotional intelligence are significant joint moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, F (1,1530) = 221.240; R2= 0.186; p <.05; psychological capital has a direct and significant positive effect on organisational citizenship behaviour, R= 0.657, p<.001; emotional intelligence has a direct and significant positive effect on organisational citizenship behaviour, R= 0.183, p<.001; psychological capital has a direct and significant positive effect on occupational stress, R= 0.100, p<.001; emotional intelligence has a direct and significant positive effect on psychological capital, R= 0.547, p<.001. Based on the results, the study concludes that psychological capital and emotional intelligence are significant joint moderators of the relationship between occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour. The proposed model was, therefore, empirically confirmed. The researcher recommends that the empirical model of effective management of occupational stress and organisational citizenship behaviour, which has been propounded in the study, should be adopted and applied by teachers, lecturers, seminar facilitators, workshop trainers, supervisors and managers during their coaching or training sessions.
- Full Text:
The regulation of agricultural subsidies in the World Trade Organization framework : a developing country perspective
- Authors: Chigavazira, Farai
- Date: 2015
- Subjects: Foreign trade regulation -- Developing countries Agricultural laws and legislation -- Developing countries Tariff on farm produce -- Developing countries
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/1874 , vital:27569
- Description: The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) was adopted to eliminate the illegitimate use of tradedistorting agricultural subsidies and thereby reduce and avoid the negative effects subsidies have on global agricultural trade. However, the AoA has been fashioned in a way that is enabling developed countries to continue high levels of protectionism through subsidization, whilst many developing countries are facing severe and often damaging competition from imports artificially cheapened through subsidies. The regulation of subsidies in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has been a highly sensitive issue. This is mainly due to the fear of compromising food security especially by developed countries. Developing countries have suffered negatively from the subsidy programmes of developed countries who continue to subsidize their agricultural sector. This position of the developing countries in the global trade system which has been described as weak, has drawn criticism that the WTO as it currently operates does not protect the interests of the weak developing nations, but rather strengthens the interests of the strong developed nations. The green box provisions which are specifically designed to regulate payments that are considered trade neutral or minimally trade distorting has grossly been manipulated by developed countries at the mercy of the AoA. Developed countries continue to provide trade distorting subsidies under the guise of green box support. This is defeating the aims and objectives of the AoA. The study examines the regulation of WTO agricultural subsidies from the developing countries’ belvedere. It looks at the problems WTO member states face with trade distorting subsidies, but focuses more on the impact these have on developing states. It scrutinizes the AoA’s provisions regulating subsidies with a view to identify any loopholes or shortcomings which undermine the interests and aspirations of developing countries. This is behind the background that some of the provisions of the AoA are lenient towards the needs of developed countries at the expense of developing countries.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Chigavazira, Farai
- Date: 2015
- Subjects: Foreign trade regulation -- Developing countries Agricultural laws and legislation -- Developing countries Tariff on farm produce -- Developing countries
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/1874 , vital:27569
- Description: The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) was adopted to eliminate the illegitimate use of tradedistorting agricultural subsidies and thereby reduce and avoid the negative effects subsidies have on global agricultural trade. However, the AoA has been fashioned in a way that is enabling developed countries to continue high levels of protectionism through subsidization, whilst many developing countries are facing severe and often damaging competition from imports artificially cheapened through subsidies. The regulation of subsidies in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has been a highly sensitive issue. This is mainly due to the fear of compromising food security especially by developed countries. Developing countries have suffered negatively from the subsidy programmes of developed countries who continue to subsidize their agricultural sector. This position of the developing countries in the global trade system which has been described as weak, has drawn criticism that the WTO as it currently operates does not protect the interests of the weak developing nations, but rather strengthens the interests of the strong developed nations. The green box provisions which are specifically designed to regulate payments that are considered trade neutral or minimally trade distorting has grossly been manipulated by developed countries at the mercy of the AoA. Developed countries continue to provide trade distorting subsidies under the guise of green box support. This is defeating the aims and objectives of the AoA. The study examines the regulation of WTO agricultural subsidies from the developing countries’ belvedere. It looks at the problems WTO member states face with trade distorting subsidies, but focuses more on the impact these have on developing states. It scrutinizes the AoA’s provisions regulating subsidies with a view to identify any loopholes or shortcomings which undermine the interests and aspirations of developing countries. This is behind the background that some of the provisions of the AoA are lenient towards the needs of developed countries at the expense of developing countries.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »