The social sustainability of low-cost housing: the role of social capital and sense of place
- Authors: Williams-Bruinders, Leizel
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Housing -- South Africa , City planning -- South Africa Cities and towns -- Research Urban geography
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DPhil
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/44390 , vital:37161
- Description: In the past twenty years we have seen the South African government deliver the largest number of houses in the world (NDHS, 2011). However, this great effort does not appeal to the principles that policies have set out in terms of equality. Along with the delivery of this high level of state funded housing, many of the RDP dwellers feel as though they have been marginalised and forced out of the area of opportunity, namely, the CBD and the northern suburbs (Huchzermeyer, 2003). Many researchers believe that the South African housing delivery pattern resembles that of apartheid segregationist planning, which exacerbated the social inequalities in the country (Huchzermeyer, 2003; Donaldson, 2001; Harrison et al., 2003). To gain an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of residents of a low-cost housing settlement, an interpretative phenomenological analysis was undertaken. The emergent themes emanating from the research study revealed that social problems were pertinent factors to the lack of formulation of community social cohesion. Without this aspect, community building will be hampered, and thus cohesive neighbourhoods will be lacking. To this end, social innovation is proposed as a solution to the Zanemvula development. The issue of social development needs to placed back on the housing agenda, as is stated in the latest Housing Act.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Williams-Bruinders, Leizel
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Housing -- South Africa , City planning -- South Africa Cities and towns -- Research Urban geography
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DPhil
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/44390 , vital:37161
- Description: In the past twenty years we have seen the South African government deliver the largest number of houses in the world (NDHS, 2011). However, this great effort does not appeal to the principles that policies have set out in terms of equality. Along with the delivery of this high level of state funded housing, many of the RDP dwellers feel as though they have been marginalised and forced out of the area of opportunity, namely, the CBD and the northern suburbs (Huchzermeyer, 2003). Many researchers believe that the South African housing delivery pattern resembles that of apartheid segregationist planning, which exacerbated the social inequalities in the country (Huchzermeyer, 2003; Donaldson, 2001; Harrison et al., 2003). To gain an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of residents of a low-cost housing settlement, an interpretative phenomenological analysis was undertaken. The emergent themes emanating from the research study revealed that social problems were pertinent factors to the lack of formulation of community social cohesion. Without this aspect, community building will be hampered, and thus cohesive neighbourhoods will be lacking. To this end, social innovation is proposed as a solution to the Zanemvula development. The issue of social development needs to placed back on the housing agenda, as is stated in the latest Housing Act.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Strategies for sustainable housing co-operatives in South Africa
- Authors: Jimoh, Richard Ajayi
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Housing, Cooperative -- South Africa , Housing -- South Africa , Sustainable development -- South Africa , Housing -- Finance-- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:9690 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1009500 , Housing, Cooperative -- South Africa , Housing -- South Africa , Sustainable development -- South Africa , Housing -- Finance-- South Africa
- Description: An increasing number of people are in need of housing that would improve long-term tenure for them. Private ownership is a well-known incentive for peoples’ participation in housing programmes. The current difficulties in obtaining credit for housing, following the global economic crisis, show that private individual home-ownership is not effective enough in addressing the housing needs of the low and middle income groups. As a result of this, the need to find an option that will solve the housing needs of the people became intense. However, the implementation of the co-operative housing delivery option in South Africa has not been successfully implemented as a result of the actions or the inactions of the role players. The study sought answer to the causes of the inability to successfully implement the co-operative housing approach through the use of ‘triad model’ that has to do with the ideology of co-operatives, the praxis and the organisational structures of the various housing co-operatives. The study was domiciled in a pragmatic paradigm, using the mixed methods research approach by conducting a three-stage research whereby convergent parallel design was adopted as the methodology. Questionnaires were administered to the chairpersons of the housing co-operatives identified in this stage one of the study. Stage two consisted of conducting interviews with chairpersons of six housing co-operatives using the purposive non-probability sampling method. The final stage was the survey among the members of the housing co-operatives interviewed. It was discovered, inter alia, that the membership of housing co-operatives was not voluntary; policy and legislative documents on social housing were biased against the co-operative housing approach; limited understanding of the co-operative approach exists among officials of government responsible for the implementations and a lack of training to members of the housing co-operatives by agencies of government responsible for propagating the approach was evident. Based on the findings, framework for sustainable housing co-operatives in South Africa was proposed from the strategies identified. The strategies identified were classified into the following factors: Policy and legislation; support services; education, training and information; and governance.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
- Authors: Jimoh, Richard Ajayi
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Housing, Cooperative -- South Africa , Housing -- South Africa , Sustainable development -- South Africa , Housing -- Finance-- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:9690 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1009500 , Housing, Cooperative -- South Africa , Housing -- South Africa , Sustainable development -- South Africa , Housing -- Finance-- South Africa
- Description: An increasing number of people are in need of housing that would improve long-term tenure for them. Private ownership is a well-known incentive for peoples’ participation in housing programmes. The current difficulties in obtaining credit for housing, following the global economic crisis, show that private individual home-ownership is not effective enough in addressing the housing needs of the low and middle income groups. As a result of this, the need to find an option that will solve the housing needs of the people became intense. However, the implementation of the co-operative housing delivery option in South Africa has not been successfully implemented as a result of the actions or the inactions of the role players. The study sought answer to the causes of the inability to successfully implement the co-operative housing approach through the use of ‘triad model’ that has to do with the ideology of co-operatives, the praxis and the organisational structures of the various housing co-operatives. The study was domiciled in a pragmatic paradigm, using the mixed methods research approach by conducting a three-stage research whereby convergent parallel design was adopted as the methodology. Questionnaires were administered to the chairpersons of the housing co-operatives identified in this stage one of the study. Stage two consisted of conducting interviews with chairpersons of six housing co-operatives using the purposive non-probability sampling method. The final stage was the survey among the members of the housing co-operatives interviewed. It was discovered, inter alia, that the membership of housing co-operatives was not voluntary; policy and legislative documents on social housing were biased against the co-operative housing approach; limited understanding of the co-operative approach exists among officials of government responsible for the implementations and a lack of training to members of the housing co-operatives by agencies of government responsible for propagating the approach was evident. Based on the findings, framework for sustainable housing co-operatives in South Africa was proposed from the strategies identified. The strategies identified were classified into the following factors: Policy and legislation; support services; education, training and information; and governance.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »