Adequacy of the advanced certificate in education to develop the work-intergrated learning competencies of principals: a case study
- Authors: Dali, Christopher Malizo
- Date: 2011
- Subjects: School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Emotional intelligence -- Study and teaching -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School management and organization -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DEd
- Identifier: vital:9472 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1342 , School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Emotional intelligence -- Study and teaching -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School management and organization -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Description: The aim of this study was to explore the adequacy of the Advanced Certificate in Education (School Leadership) programme to develop the school principals’ workintegrated learning competencies (WILCs) at the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). One of the objectives of this study was therefore to determine the extent to which the Advanced Certificate in Education (ACE) – School Leadership (SL) programme could utilise emotional intelligence (EI) to develop the principals’ intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies for collegial leadership. Another objective was to explore the school principals’ perceptions of their emotional competencies that could link their theoretical studies at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) with their practical learning experiences in their schools. Presently, one of the major programmes that could use EI in the development of school principals’ WILCs is the ACE (SL) programme offered by HEIs. The challenge for HEIs, such as the NMMU, is to offer an ACE (SL) programme that is capable of empowering principals from divergent school backgrounds. This would enable them to better understand and interpret the contextual evironments in their schools and their emotional relationships with their teachers as colleagues. The purposively selected research participants for this study comprised of school principals from one hundred and thirty rural, urban, township and farm schools. These schools are located in areas such as Lusikisiki, Bizana, Kokstad, Maluti, Mount Frere, Mount Fletcher, Cradock, Graaff-Reinet, Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth. For the purposes of triangulation, forty-two semi-structured questionnaire responses, five focus group interviews, ten in-depth interviews, and the school principals’ portfolio reflections, were used in the collection and analysis of the data. The findings of this interpretive, explorative, descriptive, and phenomenological study revealed that generally, the school principals had satisfactory levels of EI, firstly especially in terms of their intrapersonal competencies such as adaptability, v achievement drive, commitment, initiative and optimism. The school principals valued the opportunity afforded to them by the ACE (SL) programme to discuss their individual emotions and experiences with principals from similar and different school contexts. The ACE (SL) programme helped them to interrogate and express their own perceptions and experiences and the WILCs required in their leadership positions in schools. Secondly, the findings on the effectiveness of the interpersonal WILCs revealed that most of the school principals were adept at inducing desirable feelings and actions in their teachers. The feedback from the semi-structured questionnaire, the in-depth interviews, the focus group interviews, and the principals’ reflection portfolios indicated that EI could strongly influence the development of the WILCs of school principals. Politically astute principals know how to collaborate with teachers to achieve school goals. They create a culture of trust and achievement as they collaborate as colleagues in their schools. In conceptualising the development of the WILCs of school principals, one of the major recommendations emanating from this study is the utilisation of the WILCs model to develop the school principals’ collegial leadership abilities. The WILCs model was developed as a recommendation to provide a common language for discussing emotional capabilities and guidance for a host of WILCs such as self-awareness, selfregulation, empathy, conflict management, building bonds, enabling and inspiring others to develop in a collaborative and collegial manner. Underpinning the WILCs model are five major assumptions. The first assumption is that although the intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies are essential, generic and could be applied to any organisational context, the focus in this study is on school principals and their school environments. The second assumption of this model is that the WILCs are the result of rigorous research and represent a way of describing the effective leadership abilities of principals within their school contexts. The third assumption is that the WILCs are interrelated, complex, and serve to highlight key elements of effective leadership in the school environment without privileging one over another. Fourthly, the conceptual basis for the construction of the WILCs model is the vi empowerment of principals and their interpersonal relationships with the wider school community. Fifthly, and a highly relevant assumption for school principals, this WILCs model brings together the social constructivist essence of the two epistemic sites of learning discussed in this study – the schools and the HEIs – and the interconnectedness between EI and IQ in the development of principals’ WILCs for collegial leadership. Evidently, principals cannot solely depend on their experiences only to hone their leadership competencies. Formal programmes, such as the ACE (SL) programme, are essential to develop the WILCs of school principals. Nothing less should be contemplated to develop their collegial leadership competencies.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2011
- Authors: Dali, Christopher Malizo
- Date: 2011
- Subjects: School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Emotional intelligence -- Study and teaching -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School management and organization -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DEd
- Identifier: vital:9472 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1342 , School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Emotional intelligence -- Study and teaching -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School management and organization -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Description: The aim of this study was to explore the adequacy of the Advanced Certificate in Education (School Leadership) programme to develop the school principals’ workintegrated learning competencies (WILCs) at the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). One of the objectives of this study was therefore to determine the extent to which the Advanced Certificate in Education (ACE) – School Leadership (SL) programme could utilise emotional intelligence (EI) to develop the principals’ intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies for collegial leadership. Another objective was to explore the school principals’ perceptions of their emotional competencies that could link their theoretical studies at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) with their practical learning experiences in their schools. Presently, one of the major programmes that could use EI in the development of school principals’ WILCs is the ACE (SL) programme offered by HEIs. The challenge for HEIs, such as the NMMU, is to offer an ACE (SL) programme that is capable of empowering principals from divergent school backgrounds. This would enable them to better understand and interpret the contextual evironments in their schools and their emotional relationships with their teachers as colleagues. The purposively selected research participants for this study comprised of school principals from one hundred and thirty rural, urban, township and farm schools. These schools are located in areas such as Lusikisiki, Bizana, Kokstad, Maluti, Mount Frere, Mount Fletcher, Cradock, Graaff-Reinet, Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth. For the purposes of triangulation, forty-two semi-structured questionnaire responses, five focus group interviews, ten in-depth interviews, and the school principals’ portfolio reflections, were used in the collection and analysis of the data. The findings of this interpretive, explorative, descriptive, and phenomenological study revealed that generally, the school principals had satisfactory levels of EI, firstly especially in terms of their intrapersonal competencies such as adaptability, v achievement drive, commitment, initiative and optimism. The school principals valued the opportunity afforded to them by the ACE (SL) programme to discuss their individual emotions and experiences with principals from similar and different school contexts. The ACE (SL) programme helped them to interrogate and express their own perceptions and experiences and the WILCs required in their leadership positions in schools. Secondly, the findings on the effectiveness of the interpersonal WILCs revealed that most of the school principals were adept at inducing desirable feelings and actions in their teachers. The feedback from the semi-structured questionnaire, the in-depth interviews, the focus group interviews, and the principals’ reflection portfolios indicated that EI could strongly influence the development of the WILCs of school principals. Politically astute principals know how to collaborate with teachers to achieve school goals. They create a culture of trust and achievement as they collaborate as colleagues in their schools. In conceptualising the development of the WILCs of school principals, one of the major recommendations emanating from this study is the utilisation of the WILCs model to develop the school principals’ collegial leadership abilities. The WILCs model was developed as a recommendation to provide a common language for discussing emotional capabilities and guidance for a host of WILCs such as self-awareness, selfregulation, empathy, conflict management, building bonds, enabling and inspiring others to develop in a collaborative and collegial manner. Underpinning the WILCs model are five major assumptions. The first assumption is that although the intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies are essential, generic and could be applied to any organisational context, the focus in this study is on school principals and their school environments. The second assumption of this model is that the WILCs are the result of rigorous research and represent a way of describing the effective leadership abilities of principals within their school contexts. The third assumption is that the WILCs are interrelated, complex, and serve to highlight key elements of effective leadership in the school environment without privileging one over another. Fourthly, the conceptual basis for the construction of the WILCs model is the vi empowerment of principals and their interpersonal relationships with the wider school community. Fifthly, and a highly relevant assumption for school principals, this WILCs model brings together the social constructivist essence of the two epistemic sites of learning discussed in this study – the schools and the HEIs – and the interconnectedness between EI and IQ in the development of principals’ WILCs for collegial leadership. Evidently, principals cannot solely depend on their experiences only to hone their leadership competencies. Formal programmes, such as the ACE (SL) programme, are essential to develop the WILCs of school principals. Nothing less should be contemplated to develop their collegial leadership competencies.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2011
The principal factor : examining the role of principals in the success of their schools
- Authors: Dubula, Nomvuyo Mildred
- Date: 2011
- Subjects: School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School improvement programs -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MPA
- Identifier: vital:8240 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1010881 , School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School improvement programs -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Description: In this Treatise, a study is undertaken to analyse and examine the role of school principals in the success of their schools; with specific reference to township high schools in the Port Elizabeth district (P.E. district). The study assumes that P.E. district principals, as leaders and managers should deliver essential services effectively, efficiently, and with optimal use of resources to attain maximum results in school performance. The same is expected of their counterparts in any part of the country, it is not exclusively demanded from PE district principals. In terms of the current education legislation and policy framework, the principals have to account for the performance of their schools. To this end the National Department of Education introduced legislation in 2007 to ensure that principals account to the Head of The Department of Education of the relevant province. Section 16 A of the South African Schools Act (SASA) was introduced by the Education Law Amendment Act 31/2007. The provisions of this section deal with “the functions and responsibilities of principals of public schools.” Specifically section 16A (1) (b) states that “The principal must prepare and submit to the Head of the Department an annual report in respect of: (i.) The academic performance of that school (ii.) The effective use of available resources.” Since the enactment of section 16 A as referred to above, the Provincial Departments have begun to make principals account for the success or failure of learners, for human resource development, financial management, parent involvement in school matters and the active participation of school governing bodies. What should be clear is that the above encompasses all the critical and fundamental aspects that have an impact on the progress of any educational institution. The combination of the two requirements stated above reflects the extent to which the Department of Education is committed to making certain that principals in their respective schools create an environment where learners can achieve their full potential. It is such creation of conducive environments that will enable all learners in the country to achieve equal opportunities in society irrespective of their original backgrounds. This ideal is consistent with section 9 of the Constitution, 1996 which provides for the right to equality of all people. The research, also assumes that leadership is about direction and purpose, while management lays emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency. Leadership and management are fundamental aspects of those duties and responsibilities associated with the position of a school principal. It is further postulated that, a good principal understands that circumstances determine the proportion of each of these elements that is required by any given situation i.e. whether more of leadership or bigger dose management is appropriate in dealing with a certain set of circumstances or not. The study identifies variables that make a school principal a strong leader and good manager and lists the following as the critical focus areas: Balancing instructional and managerial leadership Strengthening the connection between school and home Developing effective leadership Effective teaching practices Staff development The study also assumes that township schools are no exception to those in different parts of the country. Despite some serious daily challenges peculiar to the township situations, these schools still have to perform satisfactorily like all other institutions of learning. The legislative and policy framework applies equally to all schools. The study argues primarily that all schools can perform well and develop the potential of their learners to the fullest. The difference lies in the leadership and management of the respective institutions by their principals. All stakeholders are presumed to posses the potential, the ability and the urge to do their utmost best to render quality services that would lead to the attainment of excellent results. It is worthwhile for the system that those who show themselves to lack these attributes should be identified, not to weed them out but to assist so that they acquire the necessary skills and expertise. After all it is by strengthening the weakest link that a chain becomes strong.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2011
- Authors: Dubula, Nomvuyo Mildred
- Date: 2011
- Subjects: School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School improvement programs -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MPA
- Identifier: vital:8240 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1010881 , School principals -- Training of -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , School improvement programs -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Educational leadership -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Description: In this Treatise, a study is undertaken to analyse and examine the role of school principals in the success of their schools; with specific reference to township high schools in the Port Elizabeth district (P.E. district). The study assumes that P.E. district principals, as leaders and managers should deliver essential services effectively, efficiently, and with optimal use of resources to attain maximum results in school performance. The same is expected of their counterparts in any part of the country, it is not exclusively demanded from PE district principals. In terms of the current education legislation and policy framework, the principals have to account for the performance of their schools. To this end the National Department of Education introduced legislation in 2007 to ensure that principals account to the Head of The Department of Education of the relevant province. Section 16 A of the South African Schools Act (SASA) was introduced by the Education Law Amendment Act 31/2007. The provisions of this section deal with “the functions and responsibilities of principals of public schools.” Specifically section 16A (1) (b) states that “The principal must prepare and submit to the Head of the Department an annual report in respect of: (i.) The academic performance of that school (ii.) The effective use of available resources.” Since the enactment of section 16 A as referred to above, the Provincial Departments have begun to make principals account for the success or failure of learners, for human resource development, financial management, parent involvement in school matters and the active participation of school governing bodies. What should be clear is that the above encompasses all the critical and fundamental aspects that have an impact on the progress of any educational institution. The combination of the two requirements stated above reflects the extent to which the Department of Education is committed to making certain that principals in their respective schools create an environment where learners can achieve their full potential. It is such creation of conducive environments that will enable all learners in the country to achieve equal opportunities in society irrespective of their original backgrounds. This ideal is consistent with section 9 of the Constitution, 1996 which provides for the right to equality of all people. The research, also assumes that leadership is about direction and purpose, while management lays emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency. Leadership and management are fundamental aspects of those duties and responsibilities associated with the position of a school principal. It is further postulated that, a good principal understands that circumstances determine the proportion of each of these elements that is required by any given situation i.e. whether more of leadership or bigger dose management is appropriate in dealing with a certain set of circumstances or not. The study identifies variables that make a school principal a strong leader and good manager and lists the following as the critical focus areas: Balancing instructional and managerial leadership Strengthening the connection between school and home Developing effective leadership Effective teaching practices Staff development The study also assumes that township schools are no exception to those in different parts of the country. Despite some serious daily challenges peculiar to the township situations, these schools still have to perform satisfactorily like all other institutions of learning. The legislative and policy framework applies equally to all schools. The study argues primarily that all schools can perform well and develop the potential of their learners to the fullest. The difference lies in the leadership and management of the respective institutions by their principals. All stakeholders are presumed to posses the potential, the ability and the urge to do their utmost best to render quality services that would lead to the attainment of excellent results. It is worthwhile for the system that those who show themselves to lack these attributes should be identified, not to weed them out but to assist so that they acquire the necessary skills and expertise. After all it is by strengthening the weakest link that a chain becomes strong.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2011
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »