Institutions, Production and Marketing of maize in Zimbabwe. Case of Marondera District of Mashonaland East Province
- Authors: Mafuse, Never
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Food security Food supply
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/15687 , vital:40506
- Description: Food security situation in Zimbabwe is deteriorating despite the efforts made by the government for embarking on agrarian reforms in terms of redressing colonial imbalances and taking on the major trading investment risks. The government assured the resettled farmers that if they invest in maize production, they would not be stranded by lack of marketing services as the markets are liberalized. However, this market liberalization policy occurring in maize sector has resulted in A1 resettled farmers becoming more vulnerable to traders preying on their weaknesses as the policy is not living up to expectations and is failing to bring dramatic increases in agricultural growth. This may mean that sending children to school is a nightmare for those who depend on farming for educating their children, inadequate food in the home, unpaid loans and subsequent impoverishment. The resettled A1farmers will remain trapped in the poverty cycle as long as institutions are not corrected. The general aim of the study was to evaluate institutional factors influencing maize production and marketing by A1 resettled farmers of Marondera district in Mashonaland East province of Zimbabwe. Using a sample of 343 farmers randomly selected in Marondera District, different econometric models like Data envelopment Analysis, Cob Douglas, Binary logistic, and Tobit as well as descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Institutional variables were captured in two ways: as a dummy showing whether farmers have access to institutional variables and as a continuous variable indicating importance of institutions on maize production and marketing. The study found out that, most of the A1 farmers are old, with a mean age of 47 years and a maximum of 55 years of farming experience. It is also dominated by male farmers who are literate. Results also showed that most of A1 farmers from the sample are married and very few separated. These farmers sell most their maize and keep little for consumption though they are still using convectional farming methods. Most of the farmers from the sample generate their incomes from farming activities only and they have good access to market and production information as well as extension xvi messages through training .They however have poor access to financial credit and weak social capital as well as low contract farming. Results also indicated that A1 farmers pursue the formal supply chains than informal supply chains. It is noted that, A1 farmers participate in a number of markets that include agricultural inputs markets seed, fertilizers, chemicals.; credit markets which includes banks as well as labour markets which can in the form of (maricho). In terms production and marketing efficiency, the study found out that A1 farmers are technically, allocatively and economically inefficient. The maximum efficient score is 1 while the minimum score is 0.01 for both production and marketing stage. The mean scores for production stage are 0.195, 0.504 and 0.072 for technical, allocative and economic efficient respectively. The mean scores for marketing are 0.103, 0.688, and 0.068 for technical, allocative and economic efficiency respectively. Farmers are performing better at production stage than at marketing technically while there is better allocative and economic efficiency at marketing stage. Results for determinants of technical, allocative and economic efficiency at production stage showed that, cattle ownership, farming experience, access to financial credit and (member of farmer organisation) which was used as a proxy indicator for social capital ,access to information, contract farming, distance to input market ,area planted to maize and quantity of seed used influences marketing efficiency of A1 maize farmers in Marondera District. Access to credit, Access to market, distance to market, road infrastructure, farming experience and access to information influences technical, allocative and economic efficiency at marketing stage. Cooperative membership, road infrastructure, contractual farming arrangements, and access to financial credit and transport cost to market influence choice of marketing channel respectively. Finally results from the non linear cob Douglas reveals that, maize production is significantly influenced by contract with value chain actors, access to market xvii information, access to financial credit, total topdressing used , total basal fertilizer used, total herbicides used, and total area put under maize production. The results showed that, future of A1 resettled farmers depends on correcting the institutions which are of paramount importance for maize production and marketing. The study therefore recommended the government to improve institutional environment that has direct link with institutional innovations necessary for sustainable maize production and marketing. This can be done through correcting inefficiencies and ineffective institutions by creating and maintaining both environment and arrangement that will transform maize production and marketing systems to operate efficiently. The study presents policy options to address both production and marketing of maize arguing that new direction of production and marketing of maize depends on correcting dysfunctional institutions. Policy options include increasing A1 farmers access to financial credit by removing the stringent collateral requirements which are not attainable by most A1 farmers as their asset endowment is limited to non capital. Addressing imperfections in the input markets by improving the supply of chemical fertilisers and seed at affordable prices as this influences total area put under maize production. The other policy is for private companies and NGOs to offer contract farming to A1 maize farmers as this will help them to increase total area put under maize production, access to market, access to credit, and access to information and reduces long distances to purchase inputs. Introducing focused training to motivate resettled A1 farmers on formation farmer organisations as this assists in social capital which is an important asset in maize production and marketing.Improving road infrastructure by creating a fund that would be used to maintain the road rather waiting for DDF only.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Mafuse, Never
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Food security Food supply
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/15687 , vital:40506
- Description: Food security situation in Zimbabwe is deteriorating despite the efforts made by the government for embarking on agrarian reforms in terms of redressing colonial imbalances and taking on the major trading investment risks. The government assured the resettled farmers that if they invest in maize production, they would not be stranded by lack of marketing services as the markets are liberalized. However, this market liberalization policy occurring in maize sector has resulted in A1 resettled farmers becoming more vulnerable to traders preying on their weaknesses as the policy is not living up to expectations and is failing to bring dramatic increases in agricultural growth. This may mean that sending children to school is a nightmare for those who depend on farming for educating their children, inadequate food in the home, unpaid loans and subsequent impoverishment. The resettled A1farmers will remain trapped in the poverty cycle as long as institutions are not corrected. The general aim of the study was to evaluate institutional factors influencing maize production and marketing by A1 resettled farmers of Marondera district in Mashonaland East province of Zimbabwe. Using a sample of 343 farmers randomly selected in Marondera District, different econometric models like Data envelopment Analysis, Cob Douglas, Binary logistic, and Tobit as well as descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Institutional variables were captured in two ways: as a dummy showing whether farmers have access to institutional variables and as a continuous variable indicating importance of institutions on maize production and marketing. The study found out that, most of the A1 farmers are old, with a mean age of 47 years and a maximum of 55 years of farming experience. It is also dominated by male farmers who are literate. Results also showed that most of A1 farmers from the sample are married and very few separated. These farmers sell most their maize and keep little for consumption though they are still using convectional farming methods. Most of the farmers from the sample generate their incomes from farming activities only and they have good access to market and production information as well as extension xvi messages through training .They however have poor access to financial credit and weak social capital as well as low contract farming. Results also indicated that A1 farmers pursue the formal supply chains than informal supply chains. It is noted that, A1 farmers participate in a number of markets that include agricultural inputs markets seed, fertilizers, chemicals.; credit markets which includes banks as well as labour markets which can in the form of (maricho). In terms production and marketing efficiency, the study found out that A1 farmers are technically, allocatively and economically inefficient. The maximum efficient score is 1 while the minimum score is 0.01 for both production and marketing stage. The mean scores for production stage are 0.195, 0.504 and 0.072 for technical, allocative and economic efficient respectively. The mean scores for marketing are 0.103, 0.688, and 0.068 for technical, allocative and economic efficiency respectively. Farmers are performing better at production stage than at marketing technically while there is better allocative and economic efficiency at marketing stage. Results for determinants of technical, allocative and economic efficiency at production stage showed that, cattle ownership, farming experience, access to financial credit and (member of farmer organisation) which was used as a proxy indicator for social capital ,access to information, contract farming, distance to input market ,area planted to maize and quantity of seed used influences marketing efficiency of A1 maize farmers in Marondera District. Access to credit, Access to market, distance to market, road infrastructure, farming experience and access to information influences technical, allocative and economic efficiency at marketing stage. Cooperative membership, road infrastructure, contractual farming arrangements, and access to financial credit and transport cost to market influence choice of marketing channel respectively. Finally results from the non linear cob Douglas reveals that, maize production is significantly influenced by contract with value chain actors, access to market xvii information, access to financial credit, total topdressing used , total basal fertilizer used, total herbicides used, and total area put under maize production. The results showed that, future of A1 resettled farmers depends on correcting the institutions which are of paramount importance for maize production and marketing. The study therefore recommended the government to improve institutional environment that has direct link with institutional innovations necessary for sustainable maize production and marketing. This can be done through correcting inefficiencies and ineffective institutions by creating and maintaining both environment and arrangement that will transform maize production and marketing systems to operate efficiently. The study presents policy options to address both production and marketing of maize arguing that new direction of production and marketing of maize depends on correcting dysfunctional institutions. Policy options include increasing A1 farmers access to financial credit by removing the stringent collateral requirements which are not attainable by most A1 farmers as their asset endowment is limited to non capital. Addressing imperfections in the input markets by improving the supply of chemical fertilisers and seed at affordable prices as this influences total area put under maize production. The other policy is for private companies and NGOs to offer contract farming to A1 maize farmers as this will help them to increase total area put under maize production, access to market, access to credit, and access to information and reduces long distances to purchase inputs. Introducing focused training to motivate resettled A1 farmers on formation farmer organisations as this assists in social capital which is an important asset in maize production and marketing.Improving road infrastructure by creating a fund that would be used to maintain the road rather waiting for DDF only.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Livelihood and unemployment transitions : drivers and effects on welfare in Nigeria
- Authors: Fashogbon, Ayodele Emmanuel
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Social service -- Nigeria Social problems -- Nigeria Nigeria -- Social conditions
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/9176 , vital:34302
- Description: Hunger, unemployment and social crisis are increasing in Nigeria. Statistics supports it that most of the able-bodied youth, both male and female, are not in employment, school or training in Nigeria while poverty rate is as high as a decade ago. A number of research efforts have looked at the micro and macroeconomic paths of the problem with less attention on dynamism of unemployment vis-a-vis the labour market transition, hence this study. This study investigates dynamism of labour market by assessing pattern and transition in labour market and out of labour, as well as determining the effect size of households head’s unemployment on household welfare. To achieve this objective, the General Household Survey (GHS) panel data for 2010/211 and 2012/2013 for Nigeria was used coupled with panel regression analyses to identify determinants of transitions from unemployment to productive sectors, and determinants of transition from productive sectors to unemployment, as well as effect of unemployment on household welfare while controlling for potential endogeneity in unemployment. Across the productive sectors and between 2010 and 2013, the descriptive results of transition show that workforce in the services sector (68 percent) are the most persistent, followed by agriculture (59 percent) and least is mining and manufacturing (44 percent). Transition from nonemployment occurred the most to services sector (22 percent), followed by out-of-labour force (18 percent), agriculture (15 percent) and least to mining and manufacturing (5 percent). Further, the results show that there are both locations and gender differences in the extent of transitions in the labour market. The econometric analyses reveal that job search characteristics, age, educational levels, gender, family ties, locations and time significantly determine transition from unemployment to productive sectors (agriculture or non-agriculture). Likewise, job characteristics, demographic variables, social network, location and time significantly determine switch from one productive sector to another or to unemployment. Moreover, it explicitly reveals as well from the analysis that household head month of unemployment reduces household total consumption and food consumption by 6.4 percent with gender and sectorial differences. The study recommends a combined and swift intervention on three sides: one, there is a need to stimulate education either through scholarship, or adult education from both public and private sectors; two, need to create jobs for youth to reduce potential social and economic crisis; and lastly there is a need to provide social support either in terms of public workfare, skills for jobs and unemployment benefits.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Fashogbon, Ayodele Emmanuel
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Social service -- Nigeria Social problems -- Nigeria Nigeria -- Social conditions
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/9176 , vital:34302
- Description: Hunger, unemployment and social crisis are increasing in Nigeria. Statistics supports it that most of the able-bodied youth, both male and female, are not in employment, school or training in Nigeria while poverty rate is as high as a decade ago. A number of research efforts have looked at the micro and macroeconomic paths of the problem with less attention on dynamism of unemployment vis-a-vis the labour market transition, hence this study. This study investigates dynamism of labour market by assessing pattern and transition in labour market and out of labour, as well as determining the effect size of households head’s unemployment on household welfare. To achieve this objective, the General Household Survey (GHS) panel data for 2010/211 and 2012/2013 for Nigeria was used coupled with panel regression analyses to identify determinants of transitions from unemployment to productive sectors, and determinants of transition from productive sectors to unemployment, as well as effect of unemployment on household welfare while controlling for potential endogeneity in unemployment. Across the productive sectors and between 2010 and 2013, the descriptive results of transition show that workforce in the services sector (68 percent) are the most persistent, followed by agriculture (59 percent) and least is mining and manufacturing (44 percent). Transition from nonemployment occurred the most to services sector (22 percent), followed by out-of-labour force (18 percent), agriculture (15 percent) and least to mining and manufacturing (5 percent). Further, the results show that there are both locations and gender differences in the extent of transitions in the labour market. The econometric analyses reveal that job search characteristics, age, educational levels, gender, family ties, locations and time significantly determine transition from unemployment to productive sectors (agriculture or non-agriculture). Likewise, job characteristics, demographic variables, social network, location and time significantly determine switch from one productive sector to another or to unemployment. Moreover, it explicitly reveals as well from the analysis that household head month of unemployment reduces household total consumption and food consumption by 6.4 percent with gender and sectorial differences. The study recommends a combined and swift intervention on three sides: one, there is a need to stimulate education either through scholarship, or adult education from both public and private sectors; two, need to create jobs for youth to reduce potential social and economic crisis; and lastly there is a need to provide social support either in terms of public workfare, skills for jobs and unemployment benefits.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Productivity and profitability of different maize varieties and cropping systems used in the smallholder sector of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa : implication on food security
- Authors: Kambanje, Ardinesh
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Crop yields Crops and climate Cropping systems
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/6237 , vital:29528
- Description: Low maize yields in the midst of abundant arable land, favourable climatic conditions, input and financial support programs, plagues smallholder maize farming in Eastern Cape Province. These scenarios have led the province to be a net importer of maize. In essence, low production may signify a mis-match between maize varieties being promoted amongst smallholder farmers and their farming system. Thus, the main objective of the study was to investigate the productivity and profitability of different maize varieties and cropping system under smallholder agriculture in selected villages of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa as well as, the implications posed on the household food security. The study sought to assess: (i) the productivity of different maize varieties and cropping systems, (ii) the effect of GM maize adoption on food security among smallholder farmers, (iii) the profitability of GM, conventional hybrids and OPV maize varieties produced by farmers under different agro-ecological conditions and (iv) the impact of different maize varieties and cropping systems on food security in the smallholder agriculture. A cross sectional quantitative-based survey study was carried out to obtain information from a total of 650 small holder farmers. The study was conducted in three local municipalities in Oliver Reginald (OR) Tambo District Municipality of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Descriptive statistics, partial factor productivity, gross margin analysis, household food insecurity access score (HFIAS), ordinal logistic and linear regression were the analytical techniques used in establishing correlations among variables. Results obtained from the survey indicated that under mono-cropping system, Genetically Modified (GM) maize variety was highly productive with an average yield of 1.9 t/ha whilst, improved OPV maize variety was productive (with an average yield of 1.6 t/ha) under mixed cropping system. Furthermore, GM maize (GM = -R418.10), and landrace (GM = -R1 140.29) maize varieties had negative gross margins whilst, conventional hybrids (GM = R5 181.21) and improved OPV (GM = R1 457.41) were profitable. There was a significant and negative correlation between use of GM maize variety and reduction of household food insecurity. GM maize varieties, improved OPV, white maize, white as well as yellow GM maize varieties had a significant impact in reducing household food insecurity; whilst using more than one variety of maize (landraces and GMO) positively influenced household food insecurity. In light of these research findings, it is recommended that, there is need to address household food security by growing improved OPVs under a mixed cropping system and GM maize under monocropping system.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Kambanje, Ardinesh
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Crop yields Crops and climate Cropping systems
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/6237 , vital:29528
- Description: Low maize yields in the midst of abundant arable land, favourable climatic conditions, input and financial support programs, plagues smallholder maize farming in Eastern Cape Province. These scenarios have led the province to be a net importer of maize. In essence, low production may signify a mis-match between maize varieties being promoted amongst smallholder farmers and their farming system. Thus, the main objective of the study was to investigate the productivity and profitability of different maize varieties and cropping system under smallholder agriculture in selected villages of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa as well as, the implications posed on the household food security. The study sought to assess: (i) the productivity of different maize varieties and cropping systems, (ii) the effect of GM maize adoption on food security among smallholder farmers, (iii) the profitability of GM, conventional hybrids and OPV maize varieties produced by farmers under different agro-ecological conditions and (iv) the impact of different maize varieties and cropping systems on food security in the smallholder agriculture. A cross sectional quantitative-based survey study was carried out to obtain information from a total of 650 small holder farmers. The study was conducted in three local municipalities in Oliver Reginald (OR) Tambo District Municipality of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Descriptive statistics, partial factor productivity, gross margin analysis, household food insecurity access score (HFIAS), ordinal logistic and linear regression were the analytical techniques used in establishing correlations among variables. Results obtained from the survey indicated that under mono-cropping system, Genetically Modified (GM) maize variety was highly productive with an average yield of 1.9 t/ha whilst, improved OPV maize variety was productive (with an average yield of 1.6 t/ha) under mixed cropping system. Furthermore, GM maize (GM = -R418.10), and landrace (GM = -R1 140.29) maize varieties had negative gross margins whilst, conventional hybrids (GM = R5 181.21) and improved OPV (GM = R1 457.41) were profitable. There was a significant and negative correlation between use of GM maize variety and reduction of household food insecurity. GM maize varieties, improved OPV, white maize, white as well as yellow GM maize varieties had a significant impact in reducing household food insecurity; whilst using more than one variety of maize (landraces and GMO) positively influenced household food insecurity. In light of these research findings, it is recommended that, there is need to address household food security by growing improved OPVs under a mixed cropping system and GM maize under monocropping system.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »