List of Titles

Showing items 41 - 60 of 119

Your selections:

Rhodes University

Quick View

Quick View

Rhodes University Research Report 2004

- Rhodes University

Authors: Rhodes University
Date: 2004
Language: English
Type: Text
Identifier: vital:559 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011950
Description: [From Introduction] Rhodes University has had another successful year in terms of research activities and outputs in what has been an exciting Centenary year and I would like to add my congratulations and thanks to those of the Vice-Chancellor to all staff and postgraduate students for their research efforts in 2004. This report documents the research highlights and outputs in its many forms during 2004. Research which is not disseminated in this manner is wasted and I would like to encourage all staff and students to continue to publish their research in the most appropriate way. I would particularly like to stress the importance of publishing research findings in subsidy earning journals and of converting conference papers into journal articles where possible. Outputs in accredited journals are one of the principle means by which the University earns research subsidy and increasing the subsidy earned in this way will directly benefit internally funded research activities. In terms of journal publications 2004 has been a very good year with the audited but still to be awarded journal units increasing to 202 units from 165 awarded in 2003. I am confident that this is a sustainable trend and it is particularly encouraging in the context of a national trend of declining research outputs. A particularly successful publication was the special edition of the SA Journal of Science which was dedicated to the Rhodes University Centenary. I would like to thank all of those staff and students who submitted articles for publication in this edition and Professor Barker for initiating and co-ordinating this publication. An aspect of research outputs which remains a serious concern is the continued poor recognition by the Department of Education of publications in the form of books, chapters, refereed conference proceedings and patents. Not only are a small fraction of these outputs accepted for subsidy purposes but to date no feedback has been given in terms of which books, chapters, etc have in fact been subsidised or why the majority of submissions are not accepted. The Department of Education has, however, indicated that such feedback will be forthcoming from 2005. A further, and possibly even more problematic, aspect of recognition of research outputs (and NRF rating) is the inability to assess outputs in the Performing and Visual Arts. Attempts have been made to address this issue at a national level but no solution appears to be likely in the near future. A concerted and unified national approach to addressing the issue of recognition of research outputs other than articles in accredited journals is urgently needed at the highest level if the research efforts in many disciplines are not to be undermined. My thanks once again to all staff and students for their continued commitment to research.
Full Text:
Date Issued: 2004

Quick View

Quick View

Rhodes University Research Report 2003

- Rhodes University

Authors: Rhodes University
Date: 2003
Language: English
Type: Text
Identifier: vital:558 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011947
Description: [From Preface and Introduction] The core business of a university is teaching and research and Rhodes has excelled in both. Our success in research is also exemplified by the graduation in April of 39 PhD and 111 Masters students. Postgraduate throughput together with research outputs will play a crucial role in the new funding formula for determining Government subsidy to Institutions. In assessing the research output of universities it is important, for comparative purposes, that this is done in relation to the size of an institution. Currently this research output, per size or per capita, is calculated by dividing the research publication output by either the audited FTE’s (i.e. number of students) or the state subsidy, which is largely based on the size of the university. These calculations show that Rhodes has had the best research output per capita for the previous four years. I would like to congratulate the members of staff and postgraduates, particularly in those Departments that are consistently increasing or maintaining their research output, for their contribution to the research effort of the university. I am aware that the research contributions mentioned in this report have been made amidst many demands such as increased student numbers and a very competitive funding environment, to name a few. Asa result of positive feedback received this year we have maintained the layout and format of the first formal research report published in 2002 Please note that each Department’s/Faculty’s highlights section are as provided by the Head of Department as are the research outputs produced. The table of provisional subsidy units earned by each Department/Faculty have been included as there is often a misconception that one journal article equates to one subsidy unit. This is the case if all the authors are from Rhodes University but where articles are jointly published, a pro-rata share is calculated. Likewise due to the complex funding formula used by the Department of Education, the total research outputs produced do not equate directly to the subsidisable units. Please note that "in press" articles in 2002 but published in 2003 have already been claimed in 2002 and hence do not appear in the table but are recorded in the report. Articles that have been submitted for possible publication have not been included in the table nor the report as it is not possible to prove if the articles had been accepted for publication by the time our submission to the Department of Education was audited. Also please note that subsidy units earned for book/chapter/patent/conference proceedings publications are not included in the subsidy unit tables since we receive no feedback from the Department of Education in terms of which books/chapters/patents/proceedings are finally accepted for subsidy purposes each year. Only a small fraction of such books, chapters, patents and proceedings which are submitted actually receive subsidy. I would like to stress the need to publish in subsidy earning journals and to submit accurate information so that the University can claim as many units as possible. The total audited (but not yet awarded) publication subsidy units for journal articles which have been submitted to the Department of Education for 2003 is 180.56 units. This is some 26.08 units down on our 2002 submission and is of concern. Of this figure, publications in current non-subsidy earning journals in 2003 amounted to 5.5 units. These have been forwarded to the Department of Education for consideration for subsidy purposes. Despite the decrease in publication outputs in 2003, postgraduate student graduation, particularly PhD’s, was encouragingly high in 2003 and in general it was once again a highly successful year for research at Rhodes. I would therefore like to add my congratulations to that of the Vice-Chancellor to all staff and postgraduate students for their research efforts in 2003.
Full Text:
Date Issued: 2003

Quick View

Quick View

Rhodes University Research Report 2002

- Rhodes University

Authors: Rhodes University
Date: 2002
Language: English
Type: Text
Identifier: vital:557 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011943
Description: [From Introduction] This is the first formal research report published by Rhodes University in this format. Each Department’s/Faculty’s highlights have been included as provided by the Head of Department as well as the research outputs produced. In addition, a table of provisional subsidy units earned by each Department/Faculty have been included as there is often a misconception that one journal article equates to one subsidy unit. This is the case if all the authors are from Rhodes University but where joint articles are written, a pro-rata share is calculated. Likewise due to the complex funding formula calculated by the Department of Education, the total research outputs produced do not equate directly to the subsidisable units. Please note that "in press" articles in 2001 but published in 2002 have already been claimed in 2001 and hence will not appear in the table but are recorded in the report. Articles that have been submitted for possible publication have not been included in the table nor the report as there is no way of proving that the articles have been accepted for publication by the time our submission to the Department of Education was audited. Also please note that subsidy units earned for book/chapter/patent/conference proceedings publications are not included in the subsidy unit tables since we receive no feedback from the Department of Education in terms of which books/chapters/patents/proceedings are finally accepted for subsidy purposes each year. Only a small fraction of such books, chapters, patents and proceedings which are submitted actually receive subsidy. I would like to stress the need to publish in subsidisable journals and submit accurate information so that the University can claim as many units as possible. The total audited (but not yet awarded) publication subsidy units for journal articles which have been submitted to the Department of Education for 2002 is 206.64 units. The average number of units awarded for the past three years (1999-2001) was 205.35 units. Based on past performance, the University can expect to earn an additional ±11.85 subsidy units for book, chapters, patents and proceedings publications in 2002. Publications in current non-subsidy earning journals in 2002 amounted to 16.00 units. These have been forwarded to the Department of Education for consideration for subsidy purposes. Finally, I would like to add my congratulations to that of the Vice-Chancellor to all staff and postgraduate students for their research efforts in 2002.
Full Text:
Date Issued: 2002

Quick View

Quick View

Rhodes University Research Report 2001

- Rhodes University

Authors: Rhodes University
Date: 2001
Language: English
Type: Text
Identifier: vital:556 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011936
Description: [From Introduction] This is the first formal research report published by Rhodes University. The reason research reports have not been published previously is that the annual Council and Senate report was largely a research report and it was unnecessary to duplicate this report. However, the required format of the University’s Annual Report has changed considerably from 2001 and no longer includes detailed information on the research outputs. I would like to add my congratulations to that of the Vice-Chancellor to all the staff and postgraduate students for their research efforts in 2001. Rhodes continues to be the leading Institution in South Africa in terms of research outputs relative to its size (determined by Government subsidy income). This is very significant and it is critical that this prominence be maintained, particularly in view of the recent restructuring of Higher Education in South Africa and the greater emphasis likely to be placed on research productivity by the revised funding formula. Research at Rhodes is actively supported by the University’s Management and a variety of internal support services including, amongst others, the Library, Information Technology, laboratory and equipment support services and the entire academic, administrative and financial infrastructure. Without this support it would be impossible to conduct research. Special thanks must go to the staff in the Research Office for all their efforts in promoting research and in particular to Moira Pogrund who complied the majority of this report.
Full Text:
Date Issued: 2001

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

Quick View

1
2
3
4
5
6

‹ › ×