Quantifying the impacts of cactus biological control agents in South Africa
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu
- Date: 2022-04-08
- Subjects: Cactus Biological control South Africa , Noxious weeds South Africa , Invasive plants Biological control South Africa , Insects as biological pest control agents South Africa , Cochineal insect South Africa , Mealybugs South Africa , Agricultural productivity South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/294631 , vital:57239 , DOI 10.21504/10962/294631
- Description: Invasive alien cacti are prominent weeds that threaten indigenous biodiversity and have a negative impact on agricultural productivity in South Africa. These plants are problematic because they form dense thickets that reduce the carrying capacity of rangelands; restrict the movement of livestock and wildlife thus reducing access to shade and water sources; and are directly harmful to livestock, wildlife and people due to their sharp spines. Biological control is the most effective, affordable and environmentally friendly method to control invasive alien cacti and minimize their negative impacts. Cochineal insects (Dactylopius spp.: Dactylopiidae) and the gall-forming mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae) are used as biological control agents for cacti. The agents are however poor dispersers, so mass-rearing and augmentative releases are required in order to establish the agents at sites where they are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the mass-rearing and release efforts of cactus biological control in South Africa, quantify the impact of the biological control agents on cactus plant populations through long-term monitoring, and assess the benefits accrued due to the biological control agents through the perceptions of land-users. An assessment of the effectiveness of the release effort for cactus biological control agents was conducted by comparing where biological control agents have been released with the known distribution of the target weeds. Only 26% of the quarter degree squares that are known to be occupied by invasive alien cacti have had biological control agents released in them. This indicated that the mass-rearing and release efforts in South Africa are inadequate and should be increased, especially in areas where few releases have been made and many cacti are present, such as the Limpopo Province. The impact of the biological control agents on cactus plant populations was assessed by monitoring agent densities, target plant densities and target plant reproductive outputs before and after releases. Plant biomass and reproductive output were reduced by biological control agents for three of the target weeds that were assessed, while the duration of the study was too short to measure reductions for the fourth target weed. Benefits to land-users were then quantified through a questionnaire survey. Land-users perceived biological control as an effective management option, with 81% of the land-users reporting that there was less invasive alien cactus after releasing biological control agents on their land. Forty-nine percent of the land-users believed that the negative impacts of the cactus had been reduced and that they benefited more from their land since control was achieved. Since land-users were only interviewed within four years of the releases being conducted, it is expected that the percentage of land-users who gained benefits from biological control will increase in future. Ninety-seven percent of the land-users stated that the agents were safe and had not fed on any other plants or had any detrimental impacts. These perceptions indicated that land-users regarded biological control as a safe and effective method of controlling invasive alien cacti. This study confirms that biological control is an effective and safe way of controlling invasive alien Cactaceae. It is also the first to assess some of the benefits that land-users have accrued due to biological control of cactus weeds. It is however evident that a greater mass-rearing and release effort is required for South Africa to get the maximum benefits possible from the use of the biological control agents for cactus weeds that are available in the country. , Izityalo ze-cactus ezisuka kwamanye amazwe zilukhula olubalaseleyo, olwenza ingxaki kwintlobo ngeentlobo zezityalo nezilwanyana kwaye ezizityalo zinefuthe neziphumo ezingalunganga kwimveliso yezolimo eMzantsi Afrika. Ezi zizityalo ziyingxaki kuba zenza amatyholo ashinyeneyo athi anciphise umthamo wokusebenzisa umhlaba: zinqanda ukuhamba nogkukhululekileyo kwemfuyo nezilwanyana zasendle ngokwenza oko zingakwazi ukufikelela emthuzini xa kutshisa nakwimithombo yamanzi yokusela; zikwayiyo nengozi kwimfuyo, izilwanyana zasendle kunye nabantu ngenxa yamave abukhali afumaneka kwezizityalo. Ukulawula nokwehliza ubunzini nezinga lemigcipheko yezizityalo, kusetyenziswa indlela ekuthiwa yi-biological control. Lendlela yeyona ndlela isebenza ngokuphucukileyo, efikelelayo, nengenabungozi kokusingqongileyo. Izinambuzane ze- cochineal (i-Dactylopius spp.: Dactylopiidae) kunye ne-mealybug, i-Hypogeococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae) zisetyenziswe njengezixhobo ze-biological control ezinceda ukulawula ezizityalo ze-cactus zingafunekiyo. Ingxaki yazo ezizinambuzane zizixhobo ze-biological control zingentla kukuba azikwazi kuzisasaza ngokwazo ukuba zifikelele nakwizityalo ezikude ngoko ke ukukhuliswa nokukhutshwa ngobuninzi bazo kuyafuneka ukukhawulelana nalengxaki kunye nokwandisa amathuba wokuba zifikelele kuzozonke izityalo ze-cactus ekufuneka zizilawule. Olu phononongo lujolise ekuvavanyeni iinzame zokukhulisa ngobuninzi nokukhupha ezezinambuzane zizixhobo ze-bioloigical control zokulawula izityalo ze-cactus eMzantsi Afrika, ukujonga ubungakanani befuthe notshintsho elenziwa zezinambuzane zizixhobo ze-bioloigical control kwizityalo ze-cactus emva kwexesha elide lokuzijonga, kunye nokuvavanya inzuzo efunyenwe ngenxa yokulawula ezizityalo ze-cactus ngokwemibono yabasebenzisi bomhlaba. Uvavanyo lweenzame zokukhutshwa kwezixhobo zezixhobo zezinambuzane ze-bioloigical control kwizityalo ze-cactus lwenziwa ngokuthelekisa iindawo apho izixhobo zezinambuzane ze-biological control zikhutshwe khona kunye neendawo apho izityalo ze-cactus kwaziwayo ukuba ziyafumaneka khona. Yi-26% kuphela yesikwere sekota eyaziwayo ukuba kukhona izityalo ze-cactus nalapho kukhutshwe khona kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control. Oku kubonisa ukuba iinzame zokukhulisa nokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control eMzantsi Afrika azanelanga kwaye kufuneka zandiswe, ngakumbi kwiindawo apho kukho ukhutsho olumbalwa olwenziweyo kunye nezityalo ze-cactus ezininzi ezifumaneka khona, njengePhondo laseLimpopo. Iimpembelelo yokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control kwizityalo ze-cactus zavavanywa ngokujonga ubunizi bezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control, ukuxinana kwezityalo ze-cactus ekujoliswe kuzo kunye nemveliso yokuzala kwezityalo ze-cactus phambi nasemva kokuba kukhutshwe izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control. Ubungakanani bezityalo ze-cactus kunye nemveliso yokuzala ziye zacutheka emva kokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control kwinzityalo ezintathu ze-cactus ebekujoliswe uvavanyo kuzo, ngelixa ixesha lophononongo lalifutshane kakhulu ukuvavanya unciphiso kwisityalo se-cactus sesine. Izibonelelo zabasebenzisi bomhlaba zaye zavavanywa kusetyenziswa uhlobo lwemibuzo. Abasebenzisi bomhlaba balubona ukusetyenziswa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control njengendlela yolawulo olusebenzayo, yi81% yabasebenzisi bomhlaba echaze ukuba izityalo ze-cactus zecuthekile emva kokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control emhlabeni wabo. Amashumi amane anesithoba eepesenti zabasebenzisi bomhlaba bakholelwa ukuba impembelelo ezingalunganga ze-cactus zincitshisiwe kwaye baxhamle kakhulu kumhlaba wabo okoko lwaphunyenzwa. Oludliwano-ndlebe belwenziwe kubasebenzisi bomhlaba kwisithuba seminyaka emine emva kokuba kukhutshwe izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control, kulindeleke ukuba ipesenti yabasebenzisi bomhlaba abathe bafumana izibonelelo kwi-biological control lonyuke kwixesha elizayo. Amashumi alithoba anesixhenxe ekhulwini abasebenzisi bomhlaba bachaze ukuba izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control zikhuselekile kwaye khange zidle kuzo naziphi na ezinye izityalo ezingezi eze-cactus ebekujoliswe kuzo okanye zineempembelelo eyingozi. Ezi mbono ziyabonisa ukuba abasebenzi bomhlaba bayithatha i-biological control njengendlela ekhuselekileyo nesebenzayo yokulawula izityalo ze-cactus zamanye amazwe. Olu phononongo luqinisekisa ukuba ulawulo olusebenzisa izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control yindlela esebenzayo nekhuselekileyo yokulawula iCactaceae yamanye amazwe. Ikwangolokuqala ukuvavanya ezinye zezibonelelo ezizuzwe ngabasebenzisi bomhlaba ngenxa ye-biological control yezityalo ze-cactus. Nangona kunjalo kucacile ukuba ukwandisa inzame zokukhulisa nokukhupha ngobuninzi izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control kuyafuneka ukuze uMzantsi Afrika ufumane izibonelelo eziphakamileyo enokubakho ngokusetyenziswa kwe zinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control zokulawula ukhula lwe-cactus olukhoyo kweli lizwe. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology, 2022
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2022-04-08
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu
- Date: 2022-04-08
- Subjects: Cactus Biological control South Africa , Noxious weeds South Africa , Invasive plants Biological control South Africa , Insects as biological pest control agents South Africa , Cochineal insect South Africa , Mealybugs South Africa , Agricultural productivity South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/294631 , vital:57239 , DOI 10.21504/10962/294631
- Description: Invasive alien cacti are prominent weeds that threaten indigenous biodiversity and have a negative impact on agricultural productivity in South Africa. These plants are problematic because they form dense thickets that reduce the carrying capacity of rangelands; restrict the movement of livestock and wildlife thus reducing access to shade and water sources; and are directly harmful to livestock, wildlife and people due to their sharp spines. Biological control is the most effective, affordable and environmentally friendly method to control invasive alien cacti and minimize their negative impacts. Cochineal insects (Dactylopius spp.: Dactylopiidae) and the gall-forming mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae) are used as biological control agents for cacti. The agents are however poor dispersers, so mass-rearing and augmentative releases are required in order to establish the agents at sites where they are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the mass-rearing and release efforts of cactus biological control in South Africa, quantify the impact of the biological control agents on cactus plant populations through long-term monitoring, and assess the benefits accrued due to the biological control agents through the perceptions of land-users. An assessment of the effectiveness of the release effort for cactus biological control agents was conducted by comparing where biological control agents have been released with the known distribution of the target weeds. Only 26% of the quarter degree squares that are known to be occupied by invasive alien cacti have had biological control agents released in them. This indicated that the mass-rearing and release efforts in South Africa are inadequate and should be increased, especially in areas where few releases have been made and many cacti are present, such as the Limpopo Province. The impact of the biological control agents on cactus plant populations was assessed by monitoring agent densities, target plant densities and target plant reproductive outputs before and after releases. Plant biomass and reproductive output were reduced by biological control agents for three of the target weeds that were assessed, while the duration of the study was too short to measure reductions for the fourth target weed. Benefits to land-users were then quantified through a questionnaire survey. Land-users perceived biological control as an effective management option, with 81% of the land-users reporting that there was less invasive alien cactus after releasing biological control agents on their land. Forty-nine percent of the land-users believed that the negative impacts of the cactus had been reduced and that they benefited more from their land since control was achieved. Since land-users were only interviewed within four years of the releases being conducted, it is expected that the percentage of land-users who gained benefits from biological control will increase in future. Ninety-seven percent of the land-users stated that the agents were safe and had not fed on any other plants or had any detrimental impacts. These perceptions indicated that land-users regarded biological control as a safe and effective method of controlling invasive alien cacti. This study confirms that biological control is an effective and safe way of controlling invasive alien Cactaceae. It is also the first to assess some of the benefits that land-users have accrued due to biological control of cactus weeds. It is however evident that a greater mass-rearing and release effort is required for South Africa to get the maximum benefits possible from the use of the biological control agents for cactus weeds that are available in the country. , Izityalo ze-cactus ezisuka kwamanye amazwe zilukhula olubalaseleyo, olwenza ingxaki kwintlobo ngeentlobo zezityalo nezilwanyana kwaye ezizityalo zinefuthe neziphumo ezingalunganga kwimveliso yezolimo eMzantsi Afrika. Ezi zizityalo ziyingxaki kuba zenza amatyholo ashinyeneyo athi anciphise umthamo wokusebenzisa umhlaba: zinqanda ukuhamba nogkukhululekileyo kwemfuyo nezilwanyana zasendle ngokwenza oko zingakwazi ukufikelela emthuzini xa kutshisa nakwimithombo yamanzi yokusela; zikwayiyo nengozi kwimfuyo, izilwanyana zasendle kunye nabantu ngenxa yamave abukhali afumaneka kwezizityalo. Ukulawula nokwehliza ubunzini nezinga lemigcipheko yezizityalo, kusetyenziswa indlela ekuthiwa yi-biological control. Lendlela yeyona ndlela isebenza ngokuphucukileyo, efikelelayo, nengenabungozi kokusingqongileyo. Izinambuzane ze- cochineal (i-Dactylopius spp.: Dactylopiidae) kunye ne-mealybug, i-Hypogeococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae) zisetyenziswe njengezixhobo ze-biological control ezinceda ukulawula ezizityalo ze-cactus zingafunekiyo. Ingxaki yazo ezizinambuzane zizixhobo ze-biological control zingentla kukuba azikwazi kuzisasaza ngokwazo ukuba zifikelele nakwizityalo ezikude ngoko ke ukukhuliswa nokukhutshwa ngobuninzi bazo kuyafuneka ukukhawulelana nalengxaki kunye nokwandisa amathuba wokuba zifikelele kuzozonke izityalo ze-cactus ekufuneka zizilawule. Olu phononongo lujolise ekuvavanyeni iinzame zokukhulisa ngobuninzi nokukhupha ezezinambuzane zizixhobo ze-bioloigical control zokulawula izityalo ze-cactus eMzantsi Afrika, ukujonga ubungakanani befuthe notshintsho elenziwa zezinambuzane zizixhobo ze-bioloigical control kwizityalo ze-cactus emva kwexesha elide lokuzijonga, kunye nokuvavanya inzuzo efunyenwe ngenxa yokulawula ezizityalo ze-cactus ngokwemibono yabasebenzisi bomhlaba. Uvavanyo lweenzame zokukhutshwa kwezixhobo zezixhobo zezinambuzane ze-bioloigical control kwizityalo ze-cactus lwenziwa ngokuthelekisa iindawo apho izixhobo zezinambuzane ze-biological control zikhutshwe khona kunye neendawo apho izityalo ze-cactus kwaziwayo ukuba ziyafumaneka khona. Yi-26% kuphela yesikwere sekota eyaziwayo ukuba kukhona izityalo ze-cactus nalapho kukhutshwe khona kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control. Oku kubonisa ukuba iinzame zokukhulisa nokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control eMzantsi Afrika azanelanga kwaye kufuneka zandiswe, ngakumbi kwiindawo apho kukho ukhutsho olumbalwa olwenziweyo kunye nezityalo ze-cactus ezininzi ezifumaneka khona, njengePhondo laseLimpopo. Iimpembelelo yokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control kwizityalo ze-cactus zavavanywa ngokujonga ubunizi bezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control, ukuxinana kwezityalo ze-cactus ekujoliswe kuzo kunye nemveliso yokuzala kwezityalo ze-cactus phambi nasemva kokuba kukhutshwe izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control. Ubungakanani bezityalo ze-cactus kunye nemveliso yokuzala ziye zacutheka emva kokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control kwinzityalo ezintathu ze-cactus ebekujoliswe uvavanyo kuzo, ngelixa ixesha lophononongo lalifutshane kakhulu ukuvavanya unciphiso kwisityalo se-cactus sesine. Izibonelelo zabasebenzisi bomhlaba zaye zavavanywa kusetyenziswa uhlobo lwemibuzo. Abasebenzisi bomhlaba balubona ukusetyenziswa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control njengendlela yolawulo olusebenzayo, yi81% yabasebenzisi bomhlaba echaze ukuba izityalo ze-cactus zecuthekile emva kokukhutshwa kwezinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control emhlabeni wabo. Amashumi amane anesithoba eepesenti zabasebenzisi bomhlaba bakholelwa ukuba impembelelo ezingalunganga ze-cactus zincitshisiwe kwaye baxhamle kakhulu kumhlaba wabo okoko lwaphunyenzwa. Oludliwano-ndlebe belwenziwe kubasebenzisi bomhlaba kwisithuba seminyaka emine emva kokuba kukhutshwe izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control, kulindeleke ukuba ipesenti yabasebenzisi bomhlaba abathe bafumana izibonelelo kwi-biological control lonyuke kwixesha elizayo. Amashumi alithoba anesixhenxe ekhulwini abasebenzisi bomhlaba bachaze ukuba izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control zikhuselekile kwaye khange zidle kuzo naziphi na ezinye izityalo ezingezi eze-cactus ebekujoliswe kuzo okanye zineempembelelo eyingozi. Ezi mbono ziyabonisa ukuba abasebenzi bomhlaba bayithatha i-biological control njengendlela ekhuselekileyo nesebenzayo yokulawula izityalo ze-cactus zamanye amazwe. Olu phononongo luqinisekisa ukuba ulawulo olusebenzisa izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control yindlela esebenzayo nekhuselekileyo yokulawula iCactaceae yamanye amazwe. Ikwangolokuqala ukuvavanya ezinye zezibonelelo ezizuzwe ngabasebenzisi bomhlaba ngenxa ye-biological control yezityalo ze-cactus. Nangona kunjalo kucacile ukuba ukwandisa inzame zokukhulisa nokukhupha ngobuninzi izinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control kuyafuneka ukuze uMzantsi Afrika ufumane izibonelelo eziphakamileyo enokubakho ngokusetyenziswa kwe zinambuzane ezizixhobo ze-biological control zokulawula ukhula lwe-cactus olukhoyo kweli lizwe. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology, 2022
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2022-04-08
Biological control of cactaceae in South Africa
- Paterson, Iain D, Klein, Hildegard, Muskett, Phillippa C, Griffith, Tamzin C, Mayonde, Samalesu, Mofokeng, Kedibone, Mnqeta, Zezethu, Venter, Nic
- Authors: Paterson, Iain D , Klein, Hildegard , Muskett, Phillippa C , Griffith, Tamzin C , Mayonde, Samalesu , Mofokeng, Kedibone , Mnqeta, Zezethu , Venter, Nic
- Date: 2021
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/${Handle} , vital:71034 , xlink:href="https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-ento_v29_n3_a4"
- Description: Cactaceae are among the most problematic invasive alien plants in South Africa, posing serious negative consequences to agriculture and natural ecosystems. Fortunately, South Africa has a long and successful history of controlling cactus weeds using biological control (biocontrol). This paper reviews all the biocontrol programmes against invasive alien Cactaceae in South Africa, focusing on the decade since the last review published in 2011, up to, and including 2020. Biocontrol programmes against 16 target weeds are summarised, all of which rely on either the galling mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae), or various species or intraspecific lineages of cochineal insects (Dactylopius spp., Dactylopiidae) as agents. New agents are being considered for the three target weed species, Opuntia elata Salm-Dyck, Opuntia megapotamica Arechav. and Trichocereus spachianus (Lem.) Riccob., while permission to release a new agent against Cylindropuntia pallida (Rose) F.M. Knuth has recently been granted. The biocontrol agent, Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockrell) ‘stricta’, which has been utilised for the successful control of Opuntia stricta Haw., has shown some promise as an agent against one of the worst cactus weeds in the country, the North Cape/Free State variety of Opuntia engelmannii Salm-Dyck. Post-release monitoring and recent observations of the status of control for the 11 other cactus weeds, all of which have well-established agents, are provided. Taxonomic uncertainties and misidentifications of both target weeds and agents has been a constraint to biocontrol efforts, but this has been partially overcome through the use of genetic techniques. Biocontrol is particularly successful in controlling cactus weeds compared to most other taxonomic groups, and it is likely that past successes can be repeated with new target weeds. Mass-rearing and redistribution of agents are essential to gain the maximum possible benefit from cactus biocontrol agents, and recent increases in mass-rearing outputs have been beneficial.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2021
- Authors: Paterson, Iain D , Klein, Hildegard , Muskett, Phillippa C , Griffith, Tamzin C , Mayonde, Samalesu , Mofokeng, Kedibone , Mnqeta, Zezethu , Venter, Nic
- Date: 2021
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/${Handle} , vital:71034 , xlink:href="https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-ento_v29_n3_a4"
- Description: Cactaceae are among the most problematic invasive alien plants in South Africa, posing serious negative consequences to agriculture and natural ecosystems. Fortunately, South Africa has a long and successful history of controlling cactus weeds using biological control (biocontrol). This paper reviews all the biocontrol programmes against invasive alien Cactaceae in South Africa, focusing on the decade since the last review published in 2011, up to, and including 2020. Biocontrol programmes against 16 target weeds are summarised, all of which rely on either the galling mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae), or various species or intraspecific lineages of cochineal insects (Dactylopius spp., Dactylopiidae) as agents. New agents are being considered for the three target weed species, Opuntia elata Salm-Dyck, Opuntia megapotamica Arechav. and Trichocereus spachianus (Lem.) Riccob., while permission to release a new agent against Cylindropuntia pallida (Rose) F.M. Knuth has recently been granted. The biocontrol agent, Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockrell) ‘stricta’, which has been utilised for the successful control of Opuntia stricta Haw., has shown some promise as an agent against one of the worst cactus weeds in the country, the North Cape/Free State variety of Opuntia engelmannii Salm-Dyck. Post-release monitoring and recent observations of the status of control for the 11 other cactus weeds, all of which have well-established agents, are provided. Taxonomic uncertainties and misidentifications of both target weeds and agents has been a constraint to biocontrol efforts, but this has been partially overcome through the use of genetic techniques. Biocontrol is particularly successful in controlling cactus weeds compared to most other taxonomic groups, and it is likely that past successes can be repeated with new target weeds. Mass-rearing and redistribution of agents are essential to gain the maximum possible benefit from cactus biocontrol agents, and recent increases in mass-rearing outputs have been beneficial.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2021
Interactions between two biological control agents and their target weed: a beetle, a bug and a cactus weed
- Mnqeta, Zezethu, Paterson, Iain D
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu , Paterson, Iain D
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/417475 , vital:71456 , xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2019.1631960"
- Description: Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) is an invasive alien shrub introduced into South Africa from Brazil. The leaf-feeding beetle, Phenrica guerini Bechyne (Chrysomelidae), was released as a biological control agent in South Africa in 1991 followed by the stem-wilting bug, Catorhintha schaffneri Brailovsky and Garcia (Coreidae), in 2014. This study investigated the interactions between the two agents under laboratory conditions. Potted plants were exposed to one of four treatments: control (no agents), P. guerini only, C. schaffneri only and both species together. Four densities, ranging from 2 to 12 insects per plant were used. Cathorhitha schaffneri alone at low to moderate densities resulted in the same reduction in number of leaves and shoot length as when combine with P. guerini. At the highest density, C. schaffneri reduced the number of leaves significantly more than any treatment. Mortality of P. guerini was significantly higher than C. schaffneri at the highest density when in combination. The antagonistic interaction between P. guerini and C. schaffneri suggests that these agents should not be released together because this would impact negatively on the overall biocontrol programme against P. aculeata. It is recommended that C. schaffneri should be released at sites where P. guerini is not present. Extrapolation of laboratory-based studies into the field is often challenging, so mass-rearing and releases of P. guerini should continue until there is convincing proof that C. schaffneri alone is more effective than P. guerini in the field.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu , Paterson, Iain D
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/417475 , vital:71456 , xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2019.1631960"
- Description: Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) is an invasive alien shrub introduced into South Africa from Brazil. The leaf-feeding beetle, Phenrica guerini Bechyne (Chrysomelidae), was released as a biological control agent in South Africa in 1991 followed by the stem-wilting bug, Catorhintha schaffneri Brailovsky and Garcia (Coreidae), in 2014. This study investigated the interactions between the two agents under laboratory conditions. Potted plants were exposed to one of four treatments: control (no agents), P. guerini only, C. schaffneri only and both species together. Four densities, ranging from 2 to 12 insects per plant were used. Cathorhitha schaffneri alone at low to moderate densities resulted in the same reduction in number of leaves and shoot length as when combine with P. guerini. At the highest density, C. schaffneri reduced the number of leaves significantly more than any treatment. Mortality of P. guerini was significantly higher than C. schaffneri at the highest density when in combination. The antagonistic interaction between P. guerini and C. schaffneri suggests that these agents should not be released together because this would impact negatively on the overall biocontrol programme against P. aculeata. It is recommended that C. schaffneri should be released at sites where P. guerini is not present. Extrapolation of laboratory-based studies into the field is often challenging, so mass-rearing and releases of P. guerini should continue until there is convincing proof that C. schaffneri alone is more effective than P. guerini in the field.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Interactions between two biological control agents released on Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae), in South Africa
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Pereskia aculeata -- Biological control , Cactus -- Biological control -- South Africa , Alien plants -- Biological control -- South Africa , Flea beetles -- South Africa , Coreidae -- South Africa , Insects as biological pest control agents -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/7949 , vital:21327
- Description: Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) is an alien invasive plant introduced into South Africa from Brazil, which has negative impacts on native biodiversity in South Africa. Phenrica guerini Bechyne (Chrysomelidae) and Catorhintha schaffneri Brailovsky & Garcia (Coreidae) are two biological control agents released against P. aculeata in South Africa. Phenrica guerini was first released against P. aculeata, in 1991, followed by C. schaffneri in 2014. The overall aim of this study was to improve the biological control programme against P. aculeata in order to decrease its density to a level where it does not threaten the native biodiversity of South Africa. The first part of this study evaluated the efficacy of P. guerini on P. aculeata at Port Alfred (Eastern Cape) to better understand the role of P. guerini in the biological control of P. aculeata. An insecticide exclusion experiment was conducted over 100 days. Plots with P. guerini had a mean of 187 (SE ± 62) fewer leaves/m2 than plots without P. guerini. The agent reduced percentage cover in plots with P. guerini, with a mean of 19.42% (SE ± 3.15) lower cover than plots without P. guerini. Although P. guerini had an impact on P. aculeata at Port Alfred previous studies have indicated that a reduction to below 50% cover is required for native biodiversity to recover and the agent only reduced cover to 62% at Port Alfred. Phenrica guerini has therefore not reduced percentage cover sufficiently to completely control the weed. The data collected from Port Alfred was compared to the performance of the agent nationwide. Although P. guerini was found at far more sites than previously recorded, there were very few sites with comparable levels of damage to Port Alfred. This evidence suggests that P. guerini is not sufficiently damaging to reduce P. aculeata to acceptable levels and other biological control agents should be considered.Interactions between two biological control agents can have complex and unexpected impacts for a biological control programme. The second part of this study was to investigate interactions between C. schaffneri and P. guerini under laboratory conditions to test whether the two agents, individually or jointly, enhanced or reduced their impact on P. aculeata. Potted P. aculeata plants were exposed to one of four treatments: control (no agents), P. guerini only, C. schaffneri only and both species in combination. Four stocking densities, ranging from 2 to 12 insects per plant were used. Catorhintha schaffneri alone at high densities was more damaging than all other treatments with a significantly greater reduction in the mean number of leaves, 11.7 (SE ± 1.29), and shoot lengths, 2.17cm (SE ± O. 75). Even at lower density treatments, the combination of the two agents was not significantly more damaging than C. schaffneri alone and C. schaffneri was always more damaging than P. guerini alone. Mortality of P. guerini was significantly higher than C. schaffneri at the highest stocking density when in combination. Phenrica guerini contributes towards the biological control of P. aculeata at some sites in South Africa but not enough to completely control the weed. The antagonistic interaction between P. guerini and C. schaffneri suggests that these agents should not be released together because this would impact negatively on the overall biocontrol programme against P. aculeata. Catorhintha schaffneri should be released at sites were P. guerini is not present and evaluations of the success of this agent in the field should be conducted. Extrapolation of laboratory-based studies into the field is often challenging so mass-rearing of P. guerini should continue until there is convincing proof that C. schaffneri alone is more effective than P. guerini in the field.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Pereskia aculeata -- Biological control , Cactus -- Biological control -- South Africa , Alien plants -- Biological control -- South Africa , Flea beetles -- South Africa , Coreidae -- South Africa , Insects as biological pest control agents -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/7949 , vital:21327
- Description: Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) is an alien invasive plant introduced into South Africa from Brazil, which has negative impacts on native biodiversity in South Africa. Phenrica guerini Bechyne (Chrysomelidae) and Catorhintha schaffneri Brailovsky & Garcia (Coreidae) are two biological control agents released against P. aculeata in South Africa. Phenrica guerini was first released against P. aculeata, in 1991, followed by C. schaffneri in 2014. The overall aim of this study was to improve the biological control programme against P. aculeata in order to decrease its density to a level where it does not threaten the native biodiversity of South Africa. The first part of this study evaluated the efficacy of P. guerini on P. aculeata at Port Alfred (Eastern Cape) to better understand the role of P. guerini in the biological control of P. aculeata. An insecticide exclusion experiment was conducted over 100 days. Plots with P. guerini had a mean of 187 (SE ± 62) fewer leaves/m2 than plots without P. guerini. The agent reduced percentage cover in plots with P. guerini, with a mean of 19.42% (SE ± 3.15) lower cover than plots without P. guerini. Although P. guerini had an impact on P. aculeata at Port Alfred previous studies have indicated that a reduction to below 50% cover is required for native biodiversity to recover and the agent only reduced cover to 62% at Port Alfred. Phenrica guerini has therefore not reduced percentage cover sufficiently to completely control the weed. The data collected from Port Alfred was compared to the performance of the agent nationwide. Although P. guerini was found at far more sites than previously recorded, there were very few sites with comparable levels of damage to Port Alfred. This evidence suggests that P. guerini is not sufficiently damaging to reduce P. aculeata to acceptable levels and other biological control agents should be considered.Interactions between two biological control agents can have complex and unexpected impacts for a biological control programme. The second part of this study was to investigate interactions between C. schaffneri and P. guerini under laboratory conditions to test whether the two agents, individually or jointly, enhanced or reduced their impact on P. aculeata. Potted P. aculeata plants were exposed to one of four treatments: control (no agents), P. guerini only, C. schaffneri only and both species in combination. Four stocking densities, ranging from 2 to 12 insects per plant were used. Catorhintha schaffneri alone at high densities was more damaging than all other treatments with a significantly greater reduction in the mean number of leaves, 11.7 (SE ± 1.29), and shoot lengths, 2.17cm (SE ± O. 75). Even at lower density treatments, the combination of the two agents was not significantly more damaging than C. schaffneri alone and C. schaffneri was always more damaging than P. guerini alone. Mortality of P. guerini was significantly higher than C. schaffneri at the highest stocking density when in combination. Phenrica guerini contributes towards the biological control of P. aculeata at some sites in South Africa but not enough to completely control the weed. The antagonistic interaction between P. guerini and C. schaffneri suggests that these agents should not be released together because this would impact negatively on the overall biocontrol programme against P. aculeata. Catorhintha schaffneri should be released at sites were P. guerini is not present and evaluations of the success of this agent in the field should be conducted. Extrapolation of laboratory-based studies into the field is often challenging so mass-rearing of P. guerini should continue until there is convincing proof that C. schaffneri alone is more effective than P. guerini in the field.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »