Criminalisation of HIV/AIDS in South Africa: a critical look at the Criminal Law (Sexual offences and related matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007
- Authors: Ndawula, Barnabas
- Date: 2010
- Subjects: AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Sex crimes -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10167 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1280 , AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Sex crimes -- South Africa
- Description: Human Immuno Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) have formed part of the South African landscape since the first report in 19831and today South Africa is reported to be the country with the highest number of people living with HIV/AIDS in the World2. This state of affairs, in combination with South Africa’s high sexual crime rate resulted in a general public out-cry with calls for the government and the legislature to enact laws to stem the spread of HIV/AIDS3. Government and the legislature finally responded by way of promulgating the criminal law (sexual Offences and related matters) Amendment Act4 (hereinafter the sexual Offences Act). The Sexual Offences Act inter alia provides for the compulsory testing of alleged offenders of sexual crimes5 This treatise will show that chapter five of the sexual Offences Act, indirectly criminalises HIV/AIDS, and that this is not desirable. It will be submitted that the criminalisation of HIV is against the stated UNAIDS policy 6 It is finally submitted in this treatise that South Africa should repeal all provisions in its law that directly or indirectly criminalises HIV/AIDS transmission and instead follow both and is a deterrent to public health methods of curbing the epidemic, while at the same time exacerbates the spread of the epidemic by forcing people who are HIV positive not to openly come out. It will be argued in the use of criminal law against the transmission of HIV creates stigma and is also an attack on individual human rights. The study will also show that the supposed marginalised persons, such as women and children are not protected by the use of criminal law in the prevention of HIV transmission, contrary to the arguments of the proponents of those who support the use of criminal law. The study will show that far from protecting these marginalised groups of people, criminalisation of HIV transmission, does in fact hurt them the UNAIDS policy and the South African development corporation (SADC) Model Law on HIV and AIDS.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2010
- Authors: Ndawula, Barnabas
- Date: 2010
- Subjects: AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Sex crimes -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10167 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1280 , AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Sex crimes -- South Africa
- Description: Human Immuno Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) have formed part of the South African landscape since the first report in 19831and today South Africa is reported to be the country with the highest number of people living with HIV/AIDS in the World2. This state of affairs, in combination with South Africa’s high sexual crime rate resulted in a general public out-cry with calls for the government and the legislature to enact laws to stem the spread of HIV/AIDS3. Government and the legislature finally responded by way of promulgating the criminal law (sexual Offences and related matters) Amendment Act4 (hereinafter the sexual Offences Act). The Sexual Offences Act inter alia provides for the compulsory testing of alleged offenders of sexual crimes5 This treatise will show that chapter five of the sexual Offences Act, indirectly criminalises HIV/AIDS, and that this is not desirable. It will be submitted that the criminalisation of HIV is against the stated UNAIDS policy 6 It is finally submitted in this treatise that South Africa should repeal all provisions in its law that directly or indirectly criminalises HIV/AIDS transmission and instead follow both and is a deterrent to public health methods of curbing the epidemic, while at the same time exacerbates the spread of the epidemic by forcing people who are HIV positive not to openly come out. It will be argued in the use of criminal law against the transmission of HIV creates stigma and is also an attack on individual human rights. The study will also show that the supposed marginalised persons, such as women and children are not protected by the use of criminal law in the prevention of HIV transmission, contrary to the arguments of the proponents of those who support the use of criminal law. The study will show that far from protecting these marginalised groups of people, criminalisation of HIV transmission, does in fact hurt them the UNAIDS policy and the South African development corporation (SADC) Model Law on HIV and AIDS.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2010
Critical analysis of the 2007 public service strike and its impact on the evolution of formalised collective bargaining in South Africa
- Authors: Bhe, Vuyisile
- Date: 2009
- Subjects: Collective bargaining -- South Africa , Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa , Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Industrial relations -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10192 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1043 , Collective bargaining -- South Africa , Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa , Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Industrial relations -- South Africa
- Description: Section 213 of the Labour Relations Act defines ’strike’ as the partial or complete concerted refusal to work, or the retardation or obstruction of work, by persons who are or have been employed by the same employer or by different employers, for the purpose of remedying a grievance or resolving a dispute in respect of any matter of mutual interest between the employer and employee, and any reference to “work” this definition includes overtime work, whether it is voluntary or compulsory. According to Mcllroy: “As long as our society is divided between those who own and control the means of production and those who only have the ability to work, strikes will be inevitable because they are the ultimate means workers have of protecting themselves.” 1 The Constitutional Court justified the exclusion of a constitutional right to lock out and the inclusion of a constitutional right to strike by indicating that the right to strike is not equivalent to a right to lock out and is essential for workplace democracy. 2 The right to strike is essential to bolster collective bargaining and thereby to give employees the power to bargain effectively with employers. The employers on the According to the Constitutional Court employers enjoy greater social and economic power compared to individual workers and may exercise a wide range of power against workers through a range of weapons, such as dismissal, the employment of alternative or replacement labour, the unilateral implementation of new terms and conditions of employment, and the exclusion of workers from the workplace. To combat this and have a say in the workplace, the Constitutional Court held that “employees need to act in concert to provide them collectively with sufficient power to bargain effectively with employers and exercise collective power primarily through the mechanism of strike action”. The importance of the right to strike in creating workplace democracy is also reflected in a number of Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court judgments. other hand have economic strength that is used to bargain effectively. That is why the strike enjoys constitutional protection, whereas the lock-out does not. , Abstract
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2009
- Authors: Bhe, Vuyisile
- Date: 2009
- Subjects: Collective bargaining -- South Africa , Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa , Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Industrial relations -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10192 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1043 , Collective bargaining -- South Africa , Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa , Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Industrial relations -- South Africa
- Description: Section 213 of the Labour Relations Act defines ’strike’ as the partial or complete concerted refusal to work, or the retardation or obstruction of work, by persons who are or have been employed by the same employer or by different employers, for the purpose of remedying a grievance or resolving a dispute in respect of any matter of mutual interest between the employer and employee, and any reference to “work” this definition includes overtime work, whether it is voluntary or compulsory. According to Mcllroy: “As long as our society is divided between those who own and control the means of production and those who only have the ability to work, strikes will be inevitable because they are the ultimate means workers have of protecting themselves.” 1 The Constitutional Court justified the exclusion of a constitutional right to lock out and the inclusion of a constitutional right to strike by indicating that the right to strike is not equivalent to a right to lock out and is essential for workplace democracy. 2 The right to strike is essential to bolster collective bargaining and thereby to give employees the power to bargain effectively with employers. The employers on the According to the Constitutional Court employers enjoy greater social and economic power compared to individual workers and may exercise a wide range of power against workers through a range of weapons, such as dismissal, the employment of alternative or replacement labour, the unilateral implementation of new terms and conditions of employment, and the exclusion of workers from the workplace. To combat this and have a say in the workplace, the Constitutional Court held that “employees need to act in concert to provide them collectively with sufficient power to bargain effectively with employers and exercise collective power primarily through the mechanism of strike action”. The importance of the right to strike in creating workplace democracy is also reflected in a number of Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court judgments. other hand have economic strength that is used to bargain effectively. That is why the strike enjoys constitutional protection, whereas the lock-out does not. , Abstract
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2009
Critical analysis of the impact of the common law on African indigenous law of inheritance a case study of post colonial legislation in Zimbabwe
- Authors: Gwarinda, Tafira Albert
- Date: 2009
- Subjects: Inheritance and succession -- Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation , Tribal government -- Zimbabwe , Customary law -- Zimbabwe , Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:11110 , http://hdl.handle.net/10353/161 , Inheritance and succession -- Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation , Tribal government -- Zimbabwe , Customary law -- Zimbabwe , Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation
- Description: The study looks at the main features of African indigenous law of succession and inheritance in Zimbabwe. It draws a distinction between the forms of inheritance practised between the two major ethnic groups, the Shona and the Ndebele. Whilst the research was mainly aimed at these two groups an investigation into inheritance practice by the South African Zulu and Xhosa counterparts was also made. An investigation into the impact of western influence on succession and inheritance was made taking a look at colonial legislation and case law, the general deduction being that it was a vehicle for attaching customary law to a western type law. After independence there was the issue of the impact of constitutionalism and international human rights law on succession in post colonial Zimbabwe. These were tools for change by bringing in notions of equality between men and women, issues that were highlighted in the cornerstone case of Magaya v Magaya, which was in turn discussed in the light of the Mthemu v Letsela and Bhe trilogy of cases in South Africa. In the final chapter there is a discussion of possibilities of reform and the future of customary law in Zimbabwe the highlight here being conducting proper legal research to ascertain the true purpose of custom.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2009
- Authors: Gwarinda, Tafira Albert
- Date: 2009
- Subjects: Inheritance and succession -- Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation , Tribal government -- Zimbabwe , Customary law -- Zimbabwe , Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:11110 , http://hdl.handle.net/10353/161 , Inheritance and succession -- Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation , Tribal government -- Zimbabwe , Customary law -- Zimbabwe , Zimbabwe -- Law and legislation
- Description: The study looks at the main features of African indigenous law of succession and inheritance in Zimbabwe. It draws a distinction between the forms of inheritance practised between the two major ethnic groups, the Shona and the Ndebele. Whilst the research was mainly aimed at these two groups an investigation into inheritance practice by the South African Zulu and Xhosa counterparts was also made. An investigation into the impact of western influence on succession and inheritance was made taking a look at colonial legislation and case law, the general deduction being that it was a vehicle for attaching customary law to a western type law. After independence there was the issue of the impact of constitutionalism and international human rights law on succession in post colonial Zimbabwe. These were tools for change by bringing in notions of equality between men and women, issues that were highlighted in the cornerstone case of Magaya v Magaya, which was in turn discussed in the light of the Mthemu v Letsela and Bhe trilogy of cases in South Africa. In the final chapter there is a discussion of possibilities of reform and the future of customary law in Zimbabwe the highlight here being conducting proper legal research to ascertain the true purpose of custom.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2009
Cross-border assistance in the recovery of foreign tax debt
- Authors: Barnard, Hugo
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Taxation -- South Africa Tax administration and procedure -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/15989 , vital:28302
- Description: Internationally, there is a growing drive towards inter-governmental assistance with tax matters, including assistance in the collection of outstanding tax debt. The purpose of this study is the consider the development of South Africa’s ability to assist with the collection of foreign tax debt. The South African common law revenue rule precludes South Africa from rendering assistance with the recovery of a foreign tax debt. The revenue rule, however, may be abrogated through legislation. Analysis of section 93 of the Income Tax Act1 and section 185 of the Tax Administration Act2 indicates that a pre-requisite for South Africa to render assistance with the collection of a tax debt is the existence of an international tax agreement between South Africa and the requesting state which makes provisions for such assistance. It was also found that the South African Revenue Service (SARS) would not be able to rely on section 172 of the Tax Administration Act in order to obtain a civil judgement for recovery of a foreign tax debt. Interpretation of these provisions in light of the Constitution3 and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act4 (PAJA) indicates that they do not violate the Constitution, but actions taken by SARS may be subject to judicial review under the PAJA. After analysis of South Africa’s bilateral international tax agreements, it was found that 22 agreements contain provisions for assistance with collection of a tax debt. A review of the Multilateral Convention for Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters indicates that South Africa and 73 other countries are bound by it. Analysis of the provisions of the international tax agreements and the South African case law dealing with conflicts between international agreements and domestic legislation indicates that the South African courts would give preference to the provisions of the international agreement over domestic legislation in the case of a conflict. A review of selected cases involving assistance provisions in international tax agreements suggests that the South African courts will apply the assistance provisions to taxes that arose prior to the effective date of the assistance provisions.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Barnard, Hugo
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Taxation -- South Africa Tax administration and procedure -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/15989 , vital:28302
- Description: Internationally, there is a growing drive towards inter-governmental assistance with tax matters, including assistance in the collection of outstanding tax debt. The purpose of this study is the consider the development of South Africa’s ability to assist with the collection of foreign tax debt. The South African common law revenue rule precludes South Africa from rendering assistance with the recovery of a foreign tax debt. The revenue rule, however, may be abrogated through legislation. Analysis of section 93 of the Income Tax Act1 and section 185 of the Tax Administration Act2 indicates that a pre-requisite for South Africa to render assistance with the collection of a tax debt is the existence of an international tax agreement between South Africa and the requesting state which makes provisions for such assistance. It was also found that the South African Revenue Service (SARS) would not be able to rely on section 172 of the Tax Administration Act in order to obtain a civil judgement for recovery of a foreign tax debt. Interpretation of these provisions in light of the Constitution3 and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act4 (PAJA) indicates that they do not violate the Constitution, but actions taken by SARS may be subject to judicial review under the PAJA. After analysis of South Africa’s bilateral international tax agreements, it was found that 22 agreements contain provisions for assistance with collection of a tax debt. A review of the Multilateral Convention for Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters indicates that South Africa and 73 other countries are bound by it. Analysis of the provisions of the international tax agreements and the South African case law dealing with conflicts between international agreements and domestic legislation indicates that the South African courts would give preference to the provisions of the international agreement over domestic legislation in the case of a conflict. A review of selected cases involving assistance provisions in international tax agreements suggests that the South African courts will apply the assistance provisions to taxes that arose prior to the effective date of the assistance provisions.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Cynical evictions and the possessory action in search of an appropriate remedy
- Phillips, Jeremy Alan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-0744
- Authors: Phillips, Jeremy Alan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-0744
- Date: 2021-11
- Subjects: Eviction
- Language: English
- Type: Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/22434 , vital:52285
- Description: A cynical eviction is an unlawful eviction where, in the course of the eviction, the evictee's home is destroyed. They are a notorious brand of eviction which has darkly coloured South Africa's history and social geography. And they persist still to this day. The cynicality of a cynical eviction lies in the fact that because the home, and its composite materials, are destroyed, application of the mandament van spolie is precluded. With the obvious remedy barred, there is academic and judicial disagreement about which remedy should be used instead. Some have argued that, despite the technical difficulties, the mandament van spolie should be relied on, while others insist that the extraordinary constitutional remedy, crafted in the Tswelopele case, is the best option. This dissertation argues that there are obvious shortcomings with both two remedies, and investigates whether a third remedy, the possessory action, might be better-suited. It finds that, while the possessory action has many benefits, it too is deficient in some respects. It ultimately concludes that all three remedies are only, at best, partially appropriate for addressing cynical evictions and that whichever remedy is the most appropriate in the instant cynical eviction should be preferred for that particular case. , Thesis (LLM) -- Faculty of Law, 2021
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2021-11
- Authors: Phillips, Jeremy Alan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-0744
- Date: 2021-11
- Subjects: Eviction
- Language: English
- Type: Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/22434 , vital:52285
- Description: A cynical eviction is an unlawful eviction where, in the course of the eviction, the evictee's home is destroyed. They are a notorious brand of eviction which has darkly coloured South Africa's history and social geography. And they persist still to this day. The cynicality of a cynical eviction lies in the fact that because the home, and its composite materials, are destroyed, application of the mandament van spolie is precluded. With the obvious remedy barred, there is academic and judicial disagreement about which remedy should be used instead. Some have argued that, despite the technical difficulties, the mandament van spolie should be relied on, while others insist that the extraordinary constitutional remedy, crafted in the Tswelopele case, is the best option. This dissertation argues that there are obvious shortcomings with both two remedies, and investigates whether a third remedy, the possessory action, might be better-suited. It finds that, while the possessory action has many benefits, it too is deficient in some respects. It ultimately concludes that all three remedies are only, at best, partially appropriate for addressing cynical evictions and that whichever remedy is the most appropriate in the instant cynical eviction should be preferred for that particular case. , Thesis (LLM) -- Faculty of Law, 2021
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2021-11
Decolonising the regulation of the right to strike in South Africa : an analysis
- Authors: Tsanyau, Dauglous
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Right to strike Strikes and lockouts -- South Africa Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/8813 , vital:33615
- Description: This study develops a robust approach in addressing conceptual problems surrounding the implementation of the right to strike in South Africa. The South African labour regime recognises the right of workers to strike as protected in various international, national and regional instruments. The right is guaranteed by section 23 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa which bestows on every worker the right to strike. In order to give effect to the rights contained in section 23 of the Constitution, the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA) was enacted by the South African parliament. Presently, violent strikes have been noted as a prevailing feature of the South African labour landscape. The LRA has possibly perpetually failed to realise its critical objectives as labour unrest still stands as a dominant feature of South Africa. Certainly, the labour legislative framework in place has failed to quench violent strikes whose ugly incidences have continued to haunt South African labour relations. This study therefore intends to be a preliminary examination of these issues and interrogates the labour legislative framework which guarantees the right to strike. The study begins with an outline of the historical development of the right. It defines the right to strike and other related concepts. The study proceeds to unpack the international and regional legislative framework of the right to strike. Further, it explores the effects and consequences of violent strikes with reference to the Marikana labour dispute and other case laws. Finally, focusing on the Marikana strike case, deficiencies in the bargaining system, the use of replacement labour and trade Union Liability, the dissertation offers the practical recommendations for a progressive, peaceful and democratic labour system.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Tsanyau, Dauglous
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Right to strike Strikes and lockouts -- South Africa Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/8813 , vital:33615
- Description: This study develops a robust approach in addressing conceptual problems surrounding the implementation of the right to strike in South Africa. The South African labour regime recognises the right of workers to strike as protected in various international, national and regional instruments. The right is guaranteed by section 23 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa which bestows on every worker the right to strike. In order to give effect to the rights contained in section 23 of the Constitution, the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA) was enacted by the South African parliament. Presently, violent strikes have been noted as a prevailing feature of the South African labour landscape. The LRA has possibly perpetually failed to realise its critical objectives as labour unrest still stands as a dominant feature of South Africa. Certainly, the labour legislative framework in place has failed to quench violent strikes whose ugly incidences have continued to haunt South African labour relations. This study therefore intends to be a preliminary examination of these issues and interrogates the labour legislative framework which guarantees the right to strike. The study begins with an outline of the historical development of the right. It defines the right to strike and other related concepts. The study proceeds to unpack the international and regional legislative framework of the right to strike. Further, it explores the effects and consequences of violent strikes with reference to the Marikana labour dispute and other case laws. Finally, focusing on the Marikana strike case, deficiencies in the bargaining system, the use of replacement labour and trade Union Liability, the dissertation offers the practical recommendations for a progressive, peaceful and democratic labour system.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Derivative actions in contemporary company law: A comparative assessment from an enhanced accountability perspective
- Authors: Hamadziripi , Friedrich
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Judicial discretion
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/18336 , vital:42253
- Description: The company is one of the most popular organisational vehicles for conducting business. The very nature of the company as a juristic person is attractive. The principle of legal personality entitles a company to act as a legal entity separate from its members. The principle was laid down in the landmark decision of Salomon v Salomon 1897 AC 22 (HL). This decision shows that a company is a full player in the legal arena. It has standing before the courts of law and is the proper plaintiff for wrongs done to it, not any of the stakeholders who may also be affected by the wrongdoing. However, it has to be noted that a company is just an artificial person. It is a fictitious being, a juristic person and a creature of statute. Therefore, even though a company has the capacity to acquire rights which can be enforced in a court of law and obligations which another legal subject can enforce against it, a company cannot in all respects be equated with a human person, for it has no physical substance. Inevitably, a director must act as its hands, brain, legs, mouth and eyes. Regardless of how financially strong a company can be, its juristic nature places all its resources and wealth at the mercy of its directors and officers. A company can neither protect itself against wrongdoing, vindicate nor enforce its rights without its representative directors and officers. If the wrongdoing faction in a company comprises of directors who are required to act in the best interests of the company, then who will enforce the company’s rights? The juristic nature of a company makes it vulnerable to abuse, especially by directors. It is important to note that internal stakeholders such as directors innocent of wrongdoing, employees and shareholders are not the only ones who stand to lose from the failure of corporate governance. External stakeholders’ interests too are vulnerable to abuse as a result of a company being abused by its leaders. There is, therefore, a need for a mechanism that controls abuse of power especially by agents of a company. Such a mechanism is critical to accountability as it protects the company from director malfeasance while promoting adherence to corporate governance principles in general. Also, successful derivative claims play a significant role in securing compensation for the company. Seeing that a company can be injured by both internal and external stakeholders, it is imperative that there be an effective and efficient mechanism that protects both the company and its owners without deterring entrepreneurship and stakeholder participation. Proceeding from an iii accountability enhancement perspective, this study undertakes a comparative assessment of the derivative action as a mechanism that created to deal effectively with the mischief revealed in the above paragraphs. For a complainant to be able to invoke the derivative action for relief, he or she must comply with certain requirements. Those requirements will be examined in greater detail with respect to the American, South African, English and Japanese laws. Empirical research has concluded that directors’ exposure to derivative claims remains largely theoretical. The critical question is whether the requirements for commencing or continuing a derivative action are too onerous. Although the remedy is available in theory, its shortcomings appear to make derivative actions almost impossible to invoke in practice. It has been argued that the greatest impediment to a derivative action by minority shareholders arises from the practical barriers to the commencement of derivative proceedings. With respect to the USA, it has further been demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between the significant decline in the importance of derivative litigation and the creation of additional legal hurdles in breach of directors’ duties cases. This study seeks to examine the various shortcomings of the remedy and suggest ways to make it less onerous as well as increase its availability to more stakeholders
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Hamadziripi , Friedrich
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Judicial discretion
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/18336 , vital:42253
- Description: The company is one of the most popular organisational vehicles for conducting business. The very nature of the company as a juristic person is attractive. The principle of legal personality entitles a company to act as a legal entity separate from its members. The principle was laid down in the landmark decision of Salomon v Salomon 1897 AC 22 (HL). This decision shows that a company is a full player in the legal arena. It has standing before the courts of law and is the proper plaintiff for wrongs done to it, not any of the stakeholders who may also be affected by the wrongdoing. However, it has to be noted that a company is just an artificial person. It is a fictitious being, a juristic person and a creature of statute. Therefore, even though a company has the capacity to acquire rights which can be enforced in a court of law and obligations which another legal subject can enforce against it, a company cannot in all respects be equated with a human person, for it has no physical substance. Inevitably, a director must act as its hands, brain, legs, mouth and eyes. Regardless of how financially strong a company can be, its juristic nature places all its resources and wealth at the mercy of its directors and officers. A company can neither protect itself against wrongdoing, vindicate nor enforce its rights without its representative directors and officers. If the wrongdoing faction in a company comprises of directors who are required to act in the best interests of the company, then who will enforce the company’s rights? The juristic nature of a company makes it vulnerable to abuse, especially by directors. It is important to note that internal stakeholders such as directors innocent of wrongdoing, employees and shareholders are not the only ones who stand to lose from the failure of corporate governance. External stakeholders’ interests too are vulnerable to abuse as a result of a company being abused by its leaders. There is, therefore, a need for a mechanism that controls abuse of power especially by agents of a company. Such a mechanism is critical to accountability as it protects the company from director malfeasance while promoting adherence to corporate governance principles in general. Also, successful derivative claims play a significant role in securing compensation for the company. Seeing that a company can be injured by both internal and external stakeholders, it is imperative that there be an effective and efficient mechanism that protects both the company and its owners without deterring entrepreneurship and stakeholder participation. Proceeding from an iii accountability enhancement perspective, this study undertakes a comparative assessment of the derivative action as a mechanism that created to deal effectively with the mischief revealed in the above paragraphs. For a complainant to be able to invoke the derivative action for relief, he or she must comply with certain requirements. Those requirements will be examined in greater detail with respect to the American, South African, English and Japanese laws. Empirical research has concluded that directors’ exposure to derivative claims remains largely theoretical. The critical question is whether the requirements for commencing or continuing a derivative action are too onerous. Although the remedy is available in theory, its shortcomings appear to make derivative actions almost impossible to invoke in practice. It has been argued that the greatest impediment to a derivative action by minority shareholders arises from the practical barriers to the commencement of derivative proceedings. With respect to the USA, it has further been demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between the significant decline in the importance of derivative litigation and the creation of additional legal hurdles in breach of directors’ duties cases. This study seeks to examine the various shortcomings of the remedy and suggest ways to make it less onerous as well as increase its availability to more stakeholders
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Determining jurisdiction at conciliation and arbitration
- Authors: Snyman, Chanel
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: South Africa -- Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration -- Rules and practice Arbitration, Industrial -- South Africa , Mediation and conciliation, Industrial -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/20648 , vital:29365
- Description: Jurisdiction is the power or competence of a Court to hear and determine an issue between parties, as well as the power to compel the parties to give effect to a judgment. The approach of a CCMA commissioner faced with a jurisdictional challenge is therefore an important issue that requires legal certainty. Unfortunately, our case law has not been uniform with regard to the various issues surrounding jurisdiction of the CCMA, for example: what facts need to be established in order for the CCMA to have jurisdiction and at what stage of the process should a commissioner deal with the issue of jurisdiction. The purpose of this treatise is to consider the various approaches of our courts to the issue of the jurisdiction of the CCMA and to determine what approach is practically best suited for CCMA commissioners when the issue of jurisdiction is in dispute. The research methodology is based on the various approaches of our courts to the jurisdiction of the CCMA as set out in Bombardier Transportation v Mtiya [2010] 8 BLLR 840 (LC). The more practical “third” approach as proposed by van Niekerk J, in Bombardier Transportation v Mtiya [2010] 8 BLLR 840 (LC), has been favoured by the Labour Court and the CCMA following the judgment. The correct approach of a commissioner when dealing with specific jurisdictional facts such as condonation and the jurisdiction of a bargaining council will further be considered. However, the predicament that commissioners face is that the Labour Appeal Court’s approach to jurisdiction is in conflict with that of the Labour Court’s approach. In conclusion, it is submitted that the Labour Appeal Court must pronounce on the issue of jurisdiction, taking into consideration the approach of the Labour Court as to create certainty regarding the correct approach of a commissioner when faced with a jurisdictional challenge.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Snyman, Chanel
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: South Africa -- Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration -- Rules and practice Arbitration, Industrial -- South Africa , Mediation and conciliation, Industrial -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/20648 , vital:29365
- Description: Jurisdiction is the power or competence of a Court to hear and determine an issue between parties, as well as the power to compel the parties to give effect to a judgment. The approach of a CCMA commissioner faced with a jurisdictional challenge is therefore an important issue that requires legal certainty. Unfortunately, our case law has not been uniform with regard to the various issues surrounding jurisdiction of the CCMA, for example: what facts need to be established in order for the CCMA to have jurisdiction and at what stage of the process should a commissioner deal with the issue of jurisdiction. The purpose of this treatise is to consider the various approaches of our courts to the issue of the jurisdiction of the CCMA and to determine what approach is practically best suited for CCMA commissioners when the issue of jurisdiction is in dispute. The research methodology is based on the various approaches of our courts to the jurisdiction of the CCMA as set out in Bombardier Transportation v Mtiya [2010] 8 BLLR 840 (LC). The more practical “third” approach as proposed by van Niekerk J, in Bombardier Transportation v Mtiya [2010] 8 BLLR 840 (LC), has been favoured by the Labour Court and the CCMA following the judgment. The correct approach of a commissioner when dealing with specific jurisdictional facts such as condonation and the jurisdiction of a bargaining council will further be considered. However, the predicament that commissioners face is that the Labour Appeal Court’s approach to jurisdiction is in conflict with that of the Labour Court’s approach. In conclusion, it is submitted that the Labour Appeal Court must pronounce on the issue of jurisdiction, taking into consideration the approach of the Labour Court as to create certainty regarding the correct approach of a commissioner when faced with a jurisdictional challenge.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Determining reasonableness in the light of Sidumo
- Govender, Mogisvaree Murugan
- Authors: Govender, Mogisvaree Murugan
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Law -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/11648 , vital:26947
- Description: The primary purpose of this treatise is to consider the development, analysis and application of the review test in relation to arbitration awards which is set out in the Constitutional Court (CC) judgment of Sidumo & Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others (Sidumo).1 This judgment has already had significant implications for employers and employees alike and will continue to do so in the future. Many lawyers, trade unions and employees launch or oppose review applications in the Labour Court on behalf of employers or employees. In observing this litigation process, it became clear that practitioners make two fundamental mistakes. Firstly they do not appreciate the distinction between reviews and appeals and / or, secondly, they misconstrue the Sidumo test in seeking to review or defend an arbitration award. This causes serious prejudice to their clients and results in delays in labour dispute resolution which is contrary to the spirit and purpose of the Labour Relations Act,2 as amended (LRA). The application of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,3 legislation and case law is fundamental to the review of arbitration awards and the role of arbitrators in that process. The common thread is the notion of “reasonableness” and “fairness” which has been and continues to be of significant importance in the assessment of arbitration awards. During the course of this research paper, reference is been made to the Constitution, legislation, case law, academic papers and journal articles. The references are mostly precedent setting and authoritative in relation to reviewable irregularities in arbitration awards. The purpose of this paper is guide and assist labour court practitioners to analyse arbitration awards and identify reviewable irregularities in order to determine whether it meets the bandwidth of reasonableness within the context of the Constitution and LRA. In doing so, practitioners will be able to successfully review awards without unduly delaying the dispute resolution process. During the research process, one of the important findings was that there has been inconsistent jurisprudence relating to the application of the grounds of review and the review test itself as per Sidumo which blurred the distinction between reviews and appeals. Many review applications failed to attack the reasonableness of the decision of the commissioner, but rather focused on the cogency of the evidence presented at the arbitration and thereby incorrectly invoking an appeal instead of a review. A further challenge was that the jurisprudence created a perception amongst practitioners that there was a decline in the Sidumo test. This approach was inherently incorrect and recent judgments have clarified and upheld the Sidumo test in review applications.4 The recent landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) clarified that reasonableness was not a separate ground of review but was to be suffused with the grounds of review set out in section 145(2)(a) of the LRA.5 Lastly, Sidumo did not postulate the bandwidth of reasonableness and it was left to the courts to determine the extent of judicial interference. There are various factors to be considered and CC judgments have provided much needed guidance on how to determine reasonableness. In essence, a wrong decision per se is not reviewable. At best, erroneous reasons or lack of proper reasons may serve as evidence for a reviewable ground that will together with other considerations require compelling proof to justify a court’s interpretation that the decision reached is not one that a reasonable decision could have reached.7 In order to obtain an award on the basis of the Sidumo test, the 4 Andre Herholdt v Nedbank [2013] 11 BLLR 1075 (SCA); Goldfields Mining South Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA [2014] BLLR 20 (LAC). applicant must thus assail not only the commissioner’s reasons, but also the result of the award.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Govender, Mogisvaree Murugan
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Law -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/11648 , vital:26947
- Description: The primary purpose of this treatise is to consider the development, analysis and application of the review test in relation to arbitration awards which is set out in the Constitutional Court (CC) judgment of Sidumo & Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others (Sidumo).1 This judgment has already had significant implications for employers and employees alike and will continue to do so in the future. Many lawyers, trade unions and employees launch or oppose review applications in the Labour Court on behalf of employers or employees. In observing this litigation process, it became clear that practitioners make two fundamental mistakes. Firstly they do not appreciate the distinction between reviews and appeals and / or, secondly, they misconstrue the Sidumo test in seeking to review or defend an arbitration award. This causes serious prejudice to their clients and results in delays in labour dispute resolution which is contrary to the spirit and purpose of the Labour Relations Act,2 as amended (LRA). The application of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,3 legislation and case law is fundamental to the review of arbitration awards and the role of arbitrators in that process. The common thread is the notion of “reasonableness” and “fairness” which has been and continues to be of significant importance in the assessment of arbitration awards. During the course of this research paper, reference is been made to the Constitution, legislation, case law, academic papers and journal articles. The references are mostly precedent setting and authoritative in relation to reviewable irregularities in arbitration awards. The purpose of this paper is guide and assist labour court practitioners to analyse arbitration awards and identify reviewable irregularities in order to determine whether it meets the bandwidth of reasonableness within the context of the Constitution and LRA. In doing so, practitioners will be able to successfully review awards without unduly delaying the dispute resolution process. During the research process, one of the important findings was that there has been inconsistent jurisprudence relating to the application of the grounds of review and the review test itself as per Sidumo which blurred the distinction between reviews and appeals. Many review applications failed to attack the reasonableness of the decision of the commissioner, but rather focused on the cogency of the evidence presented at the arbitration and thereby incorrectly invoking an appeal instead of a review. A further challenge was that the jurisprudence created a perception amongst practitioners that there was a decline in the Sidumo test. This approach was inherently incorrect and recent judgments have clarified and upheld the Sidumo test in review applications.4 The recent landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) clarified that reasonableness was not a separate ground of review but was to be suffused with the grounds of review set out in section 145(2)(a) of the LRA.5 Lastly, Sidumo did not postulate the bandwidth of reasonableness and it was left to the courts to determine the extent of judicial interference. There are various factors to be considered and CC judgments have provided much needed guidance on how to determine reasonableness. In essence, a wrong decision per se is not reviewable. At best, erroneous reasons or lack of proper reasons may serve as evidence for a reviewable ground that will together with other considerations require compelling proof to justify a court’s interpretation that the decision reached is not one that a reasonable decision could have reached.7 In order to obtain an award on the basis of the Sidumo test, the 4 Andre Herholdt v Nedbank [2013] 11 BLLR 1075 (SCA); Goldfields Mining South Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA [2014] BLLR 20 (LAC). applicant must thus assail not only the commissioner’s reasons, but also the result of the award.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
Director's duties under the Companies Act 71 of 2008
- Authors: van Tonder, Jan-Louis
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: South Africa -- Companies Act, 2008 Corporation law -- South Africa , Commercial law -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47892 , vital:40397
- Description: This research focuses on an analysis of the prescribed standards of directors’ conduct provision. The thesis of the dissertation is to analyse what this provision introduces into statute. Previously, the fiduciary duties and the duty of care and skill were regulated by the common law and case law. In May 2004 the Department of Trade and Industry released a policy document entitled South African Company Law for the 21st Century Guidelines for Corporate Law Reform. The policy document acknowledged that South Africa had no extensive statutory dispensation that covered the duties of directors. The policy document recognised the need to bring South African company law in line with international trends and to reflect and accommodate the changing environment for businesses locally and internationally. For the first time in South Africa’s corporate law history, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 partially codifies the fiduciary duties of directors, the duty of care and skill and introduces the business judgment rule into South African company law. The research establishes what the standards of conduct are that are expected of directors and analyses the meaning of these duties in the standards of directors’ conduct provision. The research examines whether the duties introduced in the standards of conduct provision are aligned to the common law principles. It will consider whether the standards of conduct provision amends the common law principles, adds anything new or narrows the common law duties in its statutory format.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
- Authors: van Tonder, Jan-Louis
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: South Africa -- Companies Act, 2008 Corporation law -- South Africa , Commercial law -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47892 , vital:40397
- Description: This research focuses on an analysis of the prescribed standards of directors’ conduct provision. The thesis of the dissertation is to analyse what this provision introduces into statute. Previously, the fiduciary duties and the duty of care and skill were regulated by the common law and case law. In May 2004 the Department of Trade and Industry released a policy document entitled South African Company Law for the 21st Century Guidelines for Corporate Law Reform. The policy document acknowledged that South Africa had no extensive statutory dispensation that covered the duties of directors. The policy document recognised the need to bring South African company law in line with international trends and to reflect and accommodate the changing environment for businesses locally and internationally. For the first time in South Africa’s corporate law history, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 partially codifies the fiduciary duties of directors, the duty of care and skill and introduces the business judgment rule into South African company law. The research establishes what the standards of conduct are that are expected of directors and analyses the meaning of these duties in the standards of directors’ conduct provision. The research examines whether the duties introduced in the standards of conduct provision are aligned to the common law principles. It will consider whether the standards of conduct provision amends the common law principles, adds anything new or narrows the common law duties in its statutory format.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
Discrimination against women under customary law in South Africa with reference to inheritance and succession
- Mashalaba, Siyabulela Welcome
- Authors: Mashalaba, Siyabulela Welcome
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Inheritance and succession -- South Africa , Customary law -- South Africa , Sex discrimination -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MA (Human Rights)
- Identifier: vital:11099 , http://hdl.handle.net/10353/505 , Inheritance and succession -- South Africa , Customary law -- South Africa , Sex discrimination -- South Africa
- Description: In South Africa, it is evident that women are uniformed of their essential human rights, especially their inheritance and succession rights, including protection of such rights. Human rights are international norms that protect individuals everywhere from the states’ political, legal and social abuse. Human rights are entitlements which human beings have in order to enhance their human condition. They are the fundamental entitlements or minimum standards to be met for individual so that they live with dignity. This study focused on discrimination of women under customary law in South Africa with reference to inheritance and succession. The study validated the findings of other researchers on the impact of cultural practices on women’s rights to inheritance and succession. In addition the findings revealed that efforts t eliminate traditional practices, should foremost come from men and from communities that hold such destructive attitudes towards women. The outcomes and recommendations of this study would assist the government and other institutions to adopt effective measures to empower women and especially educate them so that they can assert and defend their human rights
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
- Authors: Mashalaba, Siyabulela Welcome
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Inheritance and succession -- South Africa , Customary law -- South Africa , Sex discrimination -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MA (Human Rights)
- Identifier: vital:11099 , http://hdl.handle.net/10353/505 , Inheritance and succession -- South Africa , Customary law -- South Africa , Sex discrimination -- South Africa
- Description: In South Africa, it is evident that women are uniformed of their essential human rights, especially their inheritance and succession rights, including protection of such rights. Human rights are international norms that protect individuals everywhere from the states’ political, legal and social abuse. Human rights are entitlements which human beings have in order to enhance their human condition. They are the fundamental entitlements or minimum standards to be met for individual so that they live with dignity. This study focused on discrimination of women under customary law in South Africa with reference to inheritance and succession. The study validated the findings of other researchers on the impact of cultural practices on women’s rights to inheritance and succession. In addition the findings revealed that efforts t eliminate traditional practices, should foremost come from men and from communities that hold such destructive attitudes towards women. The outcomes and recommendations of this study would assist the government and other institutions to adopt effective measures to empower women and especially educate them so that they can assert and defend their human rights
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
Discrimination and dismissal based on age
- Authors: Hlohlolo, Sephiri
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Age discrimination in employment -- South Africa , Employees -- Dismissal of -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30309 , vital:30929
- Description: The purpose of this treatise is to discuss discrimination and dismissal based on age in the workplace. When doing this, specific focus will be on the provisions of section 187(2)(b) of the Labour Relations Act and its fairness when it comes to normal or agreed retirement age for persons employed. Section 187(2)(b) sets out certain justifications on which an employer can rely when it comes to dismissals based on age. South Africa (SA) is a constitutional state and the Constitution is the supreme law. What this means is that any national legislation promulgated must not be in conflict with the Constitution. On the contrary, national legislation must enable the constitutional imperatives. Reference to the Constitution of SA will be made, more so, the equality and fairness provisions. In the process of doing so, a probe into whether section 187(2)(b) as a constitutional enabler, will pass the constitutional muster, will also be looked into. Not all discrimination is unfair when it comes to the SA Labour Law. Provision for fair discrimination has been provided for and as a result, the treatise will also look at the concept of unfair discrimination and how it has been tested by the Courts. A further discussion will outline what is meant by discrimination and dismissal based on age, and whether such a dismissal is in fact a dismissal, and whether within the requirements of the LRA, such a dismissal or termination of employment contract, is in fact, fair. The history of the development of the concept of discrimination in SA will be addressed, and so is a comparative study on foreign law. While foreign jurisprudence is cardinal, a focus on the current SA case law will be done in order to evaluate how discrimination and dismissal based on age are dealt with. Lastly, a critical analysis of sub section 187(2)(b) of the LRA in relation to subsection 187(2)(a) will be looked at, as well.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Hlohlolo, Sephiri
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Age discrimination in employment -- South Africa , Employees -- Dismissal of -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30309 , vital:30929
- Description: The purpose of this treatise is to discuss discrimination and dismissal based on age in the workplace. When doing this, specific focus will be on the provisions of section 187(2)(b) of the Labour Relations Act and its fairness when it comes to normal or agreed retirement age for persons employed. Section 187(2)(b) sets out certain justifications on which an employer can rely when it comes to dismissals based on age. South Africa (SA) is a constitutional state and the Constitution is the supreme law. What this means is that any national legislation promulgated must not be in conflict with the Constitution. On the contrary, national legislation must enable the constitutional imperatives. Reference to the Constitution of SA will be made, more so, the equality and fairness provisions. In the process of doing so, a probe into whether section 187(2)(b) as a constitutional enabler, will pass the constitutional muster, will also be looked into. Not all discrimination is unfair when it comes to the SA Labour Law. Provision for fair discrimination has been provided for and as a result, the treatise will also look at the concept of unfair discrimination and how it has been tested by the Courts. A further discussion will outline what is meant by discrimination and dismissal based on age, and whether such a dismissal is in fact a dismissal, and whether within the requirements of the LRA, such a dismissal or termination of employment contract, is in fact, fair. The history of the development of the concept of discrimination in SA will be addressed, and so is a comparative study on foreign law. While foreign jurisprudence is cardinal, a focus on the current SA case law will be done in order to evaluate how discrimination and dismissal based on age are dealt with. Lastly, a critical analysis of sub section 187(2)(b) of the LRA in relation to subsection 187(2)(a) will be looked at, as well.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Discrimination based on age in labour law
- Authors: Oosthuizen, Tania
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Age and employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Age discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19484 , vital:28884
- Description: This piece aims to prove that a compulsory retirement age can no longer be justified in South Africa as a constitutional state. In times where people are gradually reaching older ages due to advances in a variety of fields, it seemed that the concept of a compulsory retirement age requires an in depth consideration. This is especially measured against the backdrop of equality and discrimination legislation within The Republic of South Africa. The development of social security law provides the larger framework in which to understand the concept and intentions around retirement. Discrimination and equality legislation demonstrates that age as a listed ground for discrimination does not necessarily simplify the jurisprudence pertaining to it, especially where alternatives have been developed for continued employment. The main point of reference in the South African justice system concerning discrimination disputes is the Harksen v Lane test, whereas the principle encapsulated in Waco v Schweitzer, relates particularly to discrimination based on age. These judgements and subsequent application will be illustrated and considered during the course of this research. The influence of fund rules and fixed-term contracts on the situation will aim to show the reality of the situation. In an effort to show that the problem of an ageing workforce and retirement is not localised to South Africa, an international overview of other constitutional countries is included for context. The comparison goes further to include non-constitutional countries to illustrate the global issue. This comparison was also included in an effort to find alternative strategies that may be utilised in South Africa for retirement and age discrimination legislations and social policies.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Oosthuizen, Tania
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Age and employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Age discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19484 , vital:28884
- Description: This piece aims to prove that a compulsory retirement age can no longer be justified in South Africa as a constitutional state. In times where people are gradually reaching older ages due to advances in a variety of fields, it seemed that the concept of a compulsory retirement age requires an in depth consideration. This is especially measured against the backdrop of equality and discrimination legislation within The Republic of South Africa. The development of social security law provides the larger framework in which to understand the concept and intentions around retirement. Discrimination and equality legislation demonstrates that age as a listed ground for discrimination does not necessarily simplify the jurisprudence pertaining to it, especially where alternatives have been developed for continued employment. The main point of reference in the South African justice system concerning discrimination disputes is the Harksen v Lane test, whereas the principle encapsulated in Waco v Schweitzer, relates particularly to discrimination based on age. These judgements and subsequent application will be illustrated and considered during the course of this research. The influence of fund rules and fixed-term contracts on the situation will aim to show the reality of the situation. In an effort to show that the problem of an ageing workforce and retirement is not localised to South Africa, an international overview of other constitutional countries is included for context. The comparison goes further to include non-constitutional countries to illustrate the global issue. This comparison was also included in an effort to find alternative strategies that may be utilised in South Africa for retirement and age discrimination legislations and social policies.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Dismissal due to excessive ill health absenteeism
- Authors: Van der Walt, Natasha
- Date: 2010
- Subjects: Employees, Dismissal of -- South Africa , Absenteeism (Labor) -- South Africa , Employees -- Health and hygiene
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10201 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1286 , Employees, Dismissal of -- South Africa , Absenteeism (Labor) -- South Africa , Employees -- Health and hygiene
- Description: In a globally competitive market place companies strive to become as efficient as possible. Absenteeism is a worldwide problem as it impacts on company efficiency and cost effectiveness. A large portion of absenteeism can be attributed to ill health absences. Companies have prioritized the need to find ways of managing and reducing absenteeism. In South Africa such processes have to occur within the confines of a constitutional right to fair labour practices and other prescriptive labour legislation. The issue is somewhat complicated by the fact that employees have a right to paid time off due to illness. It is thus clear that not all ill health absenteeism can be deemed problematic. A balancing act needs to occur between the operational needs of the employer and the rights of employees. Ill health absenteeism becomes problematic once a threshold is reached at which point it becomes intolerable for the employer, thus deemed excessive. Excessive ill health absenteeism is not a difficult concept to understand, however it is not specifically defined. A universal concept of when absence is deemed to have reached the threshold of excessiveness does not exist and varies from one employer to the next. Excessive ill health absence is a multi-facetted concept (as a result of the various types of ill health absence) and thus a universal process cannot be adopted to deal with all types of excessive ill health absenteeism. In an attempt to deal with the different types of ill health absenteeism it is pertinent to categorize the issues. The author suggests various ways of dealing with ill health absenteeism, depending on the facts of each case. A misconduct process should only be applicable in instances where it can be proved that sick leave is used inappropriately or the reason for absence is unknown. Although case law suggests the prevalence of dealing with ill health absence as misconduct, especially in the case of persistent short term absence, these cases rarely prove that abuse is taking place. Suspicions regarding abuse without proper evidence to support such claims will not satisfy the substantive fairness requirements. In the event that illness is of a medium to long term nature, an ill health incapacity process may be the most appropriate process to apply, as in such instances a clearly distinguishable illness exists, which makes accommodation less problematic. Such a process is less suited to persistent short term absence as this can be the result of many illnesses or injuries. In the case of persistent short term absence, the individual may be fully capable of performing their duties upon returning to work, however their frequent absence causes unreliability and inefficiency. It is clear in this instance that accommodation cannot take place due to the unpredictable nature of the absences. The concern with persistent short term absence is less with the illness or illnesses displayed and more with the absences itself. The author suggests that it may be appropriate to deal with such absences on the basis of incapacity due to poor work performance. This assertion is based on the fact that the concern is with frequent short term absence that causes the employee to be unreliable; however the illnesses are not of such a nature that it can warrant accommodation. If it is accepted that the employee is not malingering or if the malingering cannot be proved the employee has failed to meet a performance standard (attendance standard). It is suggested that as part of any incapacity investigation consideration should be given to whether the illness or injury can be deemed a disability. This is necessary as disabled individuals are afforded special protection and treatment. A dismissal of an incapacitated individual that is actually deemed “disabled” could be held to be automatically unfair and therefore it is pertinent that this is established at the outset.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2010
- Authors: Van der Walt, Natasha
- Date: 2010
- Subjects: Employees, Dismissal of -- South Africa , Absenteeism (Labor) -- South Africa , Employees -- Health and hygiene
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10201 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1286 , Employees, Dismissal of -- South Africa , Absenteeism (Labor) -- South Africa , Employees -- Health and hygiene
- Description: In a globally competitive market place companies strive to become as efficient as possible. Absenteeism is a worldwide problem as it impacts on company efficiency and cost effectiveness. A large portion of absenteeism can be attributed to ill health absences. Companies have prioritized the need to find ways of managing and reducing absenteeism. In South Africa such processes have to occur within the confines of a constitutional right to fair labour practices and other prescriptive labour legislation. The issue is somewhat complicated by the fact that employees have a right to paid time off due to illness. It is thus clear that not all ill health absenteeism can be deemed problematic. A balancing act needs to occur between the operational needs of the employer and the rights of employees. Ill health absenteeism becomes problematic once a threshold is reached at which point it becomes intolerable for the employer, thus deemed excessive. Excessive ill health absenteeism is not a difficult concept to understand, however it is not specifically defined. A universal concept of when absence is deemed to have reached the threshold of excessiveness does not exist and varies from one employer to the next. Excessive ill health absence is a multi-facetted concept (as a result of the various types of ill health absence) and thus a universal process cannot be adopted to deal with all types of excessive ill health absenteeism. In an attempt to deal with the different types of ill health absenteeism it is pertinent to categorize the issues. The author suggests various ways of dealing with ill health absenteeism, depending on the facts of each case. A misconduct process should only be applicable in instances where it can be proved that sick leave is used inappropriately or the reason for absence is unknown. Although case law suggests the prevalence of dealing with ill health absence as misconduct, especially in the case of persistent short term absence, these cases rarely prove that abuse is taking place. Suspicions regarding abuse without proper evidence to support such claims will not satisfy the substantive fairness requirements. In the event that illness is of a medium to long term nature, an ill health incapacity process may be the most appropriate process to apply, as in such instances a clearly distinguishable illness exists, which makes accommodation less problematic. Such a process is less suited to persistent short term absence as this can be the result of many illnesses or injuries. In the case of persistent short term absence, the individual may be fully capable of performing their duties upon returning to work, however their frequent absence causes unreliability and inefficiency. It is clear in this instance that accommodation cannot take place due to the unpredictable nature of the absences. The concern with persistent short term absence is less with the illness or illnesses displayed and more with the absences itself. The author suggests that it may be appropriate to deal with such absences on the basis of incapacity due to poor work performance. This assertion is based on the fact that the concern is with frequent short term absence that causes the employee to be unreliable; however the illnesses are not of such a nature that it can warrant accommodation. If it is accepted that the employee is not malingering or if the malingering cannot be proved the employee has failed to meet a performance standard (attendance standard). It is suggested that as part of any incapacity investigation consideration should be given to whether the illness or injury can be deemed a disability. This is necessary as disabled individuals are afforded special protection and treatment. A dismissal of an incapacitated individual that is actually deemed “disabled” could be held to be automatically unfair and therefore it is pertinent that this is established at the outset.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2010
Dismissal due to pregnancy
- Authors: Ledwaba, Lesetsa Joel
- Date: 2006
- Subjects: Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pregnant women -- Employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10190 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/433 , Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pregnant women -- Employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Description: Previously, our workplaces were characterised by serious hardships emanating from labour laws which did not always cater for all areas of the employment relationship. South African female employees were without a clear legitimate remedial right precluding any severe violation and infringement to their fundamental rights resulting from their pregnancy; a task they did not opt for in the first place, but was instead, naturally imposed on them as a result of their gender category. Undoubtedly, many female employees were victims of unfair discrimination. The legislature therefore saw it fit to democratise the workplace by making rapid statutory interventions. As a result, a number of significant changes in various spheres of our labour laws were brought in. Amongst the greatly notable valuable changes was the introduction of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998. This piece of legislation has generally reformed our industrial society by bringing in the elimination of unfair discrimination and thereby enhancing the principle of equity in the workplace. The act has further touched a place within hearts of female employees for fear of discrimination as a result of their pregnancy status or any reasons related to their pregnancy. The act further codified Industrial Court decisions that were already established under the discrimination law jurisprudence from the Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956. The application of the provisions of the Act has made the employment relationship no longer to be a comfort zone for employers. These general changes to the law also impact on the dismissal law regime. The purpose of this treatise is to give an overview of the applicable legislation and contributions made by the Labour Courts in developing pregnancy dismissal and discrimination law. The Labour Courts have handed down few judgements that have helped in clarifying the provisions of both the current Labour Relations Act and the Employment Equity Act around the topic. One should hasten to say that this has never been a smooth process by the courts. It is further shown in this treatise that some of the court decisions were not well accepted in the light of other important considerations, such as the equality provisions of the Constitution. For the purpose of effectively dealing with this topic, this treatise contains a discussion of the historical context of discrimination law in the form of common-law position, and the discrimination law before the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. It then endeavours to identify the legislative provision of the Act when it comes to discrimination law provisions. At the same time the important court decisions that were made are identified and examined.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2006
- Authors: Ledwaba, Lesetsa Joel
- Date: 2006
- Subjects: Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pregnant women -- Employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10190 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/433 , Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pregnant women -- Employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Description: Previously, our workplaces were characterised by serious hardships emanating from labour laws which did not always cater for all areas of the employment relationship. South African female employees were without a clear legitimate remedial right precluding any severe violation and infringement to their fundamental rights resulting from their pregnancy; a task they did not opt for in the first place, but was instead, naturally imposed on them as a result of their gender category. Undoubtedly, many female employees were victims of unfair discrimination. The legislature therefore saw it fit to democratise the workplace by making rapid statutory interventions. As a result, a number of significant changes in various spheres of our labour laws were brought in. Amongst the greatly notable valuable changes was the introduction of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998. This piece of legislation has generally reformed our industrial society by bringing in the elimination of unfair discrimination and thereby enhancing the principle of equity in the workplace. The act has further touched a place within hearts of female employees for fear of discrimination as a result of their pregnancy status or any reasons related to their pregnancy. The act further codified Industrial Court decisions that were already established under the discrimination law jurisprudence from the Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956. The application of the provisions of the Act has made the employment relationship no longer to be a comfort zone for employers. These general changes to the law also impact on the dismissal law regime. The purpose of this treatise is to give an overview of the applicable legislation and contributions made by the Labour Courts in developing pregnancy dismissal and discrimination law. The Labour Courts have handed down few judgements that have helped in clarifying the provisions of both the current Labour Relations Act and the Employment Equity Act around the topic. One should hasten to say that this has never been a smooth process by the courts. It is further shown in this treatise that some of the court decisions were not well accepted in the light of other important considerations, such as the equality provisions of the Constitution. For the purpose of effectively dealing with this topic, this treatise contains a discussion of the historical context of discrimination law in the form of common-law position, and the discrimination law before the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. It then endeavours to identify the legislative provision of the Act when it comes to discrimination law provisions. At the same time the important court decisions that were made are identified and examined.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2006
Dismissal for ill health or injury and reasonable accommodation for disabled employees
- Authors: Mabenge, Mfundiso Samson
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Discrimination in employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/34755 , vital:33437
- Description: This treatise examines the challenges faced by people with disabilities, in particular, dismissal and discrimination at the workplace. The study employed a qualitative approach to explore and address the research questions. It highlights that the Constitution provides protection against discrimination on the ground of disability. This right not to be discriminated against or unfairly dismissed is further given effect by the Codes of Good Practice in both the EEA and the LRA. Dismissal on a prohibited ground of discrimination, such as disability, is not merely unfair, but automatically unfair. Despite the above legislative protection, the findings in this study indicate that South Africa still faces huge challenges of disability discrimination and dismissal. Notwithstanding the increased sensitivity of this subject across the country, applicants for work and employees generally find themselves to be the victims of employment discrimination as well as dismissal due to their disability. Those who are in the working sector are not reasonably accommodated. The study submits that people with disabilities should be reasonably accommodated and be retained in the working sector as they have a positive role to play in the economy. In terms of legislation, the study found that although well written in theory, they are practically ineffective given that they are fragmented. This study observes that single legislation dealing comprehensively with disability management, like in other jurisdictions does not exist in South Africa. The lack of such single legislation is a significant weakness in the South African disability management framework. Therefore, this has resulted in a fragmented approach to implementation. The study suggests that trade union representatives and employers should be well trained, particularly on issues relating to dismissal for incapacity in general. From a global perspective, international organisations through ratifying Conventions have also heeded to the plight of disabled persons. This is proof that disability can no longer be confined to the borders of one nation. Many disability organisations have emerged over the years and are representing the interests of the disabled. The findings of this study may help companies, organisations and institutions improve their policy practices regarding the dismissal of employees associated with ill health or injury.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Mabenge, Mfundiso Samson
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Discrimination in employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/34755 , vital:33437
- Description: This treatise examines the challenges faced by people with disabilities, in particular, dismissal and discrimination at the workplace. The study employed a qualitative approach to explore and address the research questions. It highlights that the Constitution provides protection against discrimination on the ground of disability. This right not to be discriminated against or unfairly dismissed is further given effect by the Codes of Good Practice in both the EEA and the LRA. Dismissal on a prohibited ground of discrimination, such as disability, is not merely unfair, but automatically unfair. Despite the above legislative protection, the findings in this study indicate that South Africa still faces huge challenges of disability discrimination and dismissal. Notwithstanding the increased sensitivity of this subject across the country, applicants for work and employees generally find themselves to be the victims of employment discrimination as well as dismissal due to their disability. Those who are in the working sector are not reasonably accommodated. The study submits that people with disabilities should be reasonably accommodated and be retained in the working sector as they have a positive role to play in the economy. In terms of legislation, the study found that although well written in theory, they are practically ineffective given that they are fragmented. This study observes that single legislation dealing comprehensively with disability management, like in other jurisdictions does not exist in South Africa. The lack of such single legislation is a significant weakness in the South African disability management framework. Therefore, this has resulted in a fragmented approach to implementation. The study suggests that trade union representatives and employers should be well trained, particularly on issues relating to dismissal for incapacity in general. From a global perspective, international organisations through ratifying Conventions have also heeded to the plight of disabled persons. This is proof that disability can no longer be confined to the borders of one nation. Many disability organisations have emerged over the years and are representing the interests of the disabled. The findings of this study may help companies, organisations and institutions improve their policy practices regarding the dismissal of employees associated with ill health or injury.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Dismissal for medical incapacity
- Authors: Boy, Anthony Albert
- Date: 2004
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Capacity and disability -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:11047 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/316 , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Capacity and disability -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Description: Labour law in South Africa has evolved over the past century at an ever increasing pace. The establishment of a democratic government in 1995 has been the trigger for a large number of labour law statutes being promulgated, particularly with reference to the laws governing the employment relationship and dismissal. From very humble and employer biased dispute resolution application under the common law of contract, labour law in this country has evolved through the various acts culminating in a labour law system which is highly regulated and codified. Dismissal for medical incapacity in this treatise is reviewed with regard to the applicable statutes and the various codes of good practice as the law has evolved and developed from the period covered by the common law through that covered by the 1995 LRA up to and including the current period. Particular attention is paid to both substantive and procedural requirements as well as the remedies applicable under the different legal regimes and the pertinent tribunals and courts. Regard is also given to the duration and causes of incapacity and the effect this may have on the applicable remedy applied by these tribunals. It will become apparant that the medically incapacitated employee occupied a relatively weak and vulnerable position under the common law as opposed to the current position under the 1995 LRA. The influence of the remedies applied by the tribunals under the 1956 LRA are clearly evident in the current regulations and codes under the 1995 LRA which contain specific statutory provisions for employees not to be unfairly dismissed. Distinctions are drawn between permissible and impermissible dismissals, with medical incapacity falling under the former. v Furthermore, a distinction is drawn statutorily between permanent and temporary illhealth/ injury incapacity with detailed guidelines for substantive and procedural fairness requirements to be met by employers. The powers of the specialist tribunals (CCMA, Bargaining Councils and Labour Courts) are regulated by statutory provisions and deal with appropriate remedies (reinstatement and/or compensation) a wardable in appropriate circumstances. Certain specific areas nonetheless still remain problematic for these tribunals and hence questions that require clear direction from the drafters of our law are: 1. How to distinguish misconduct in alcohol and drug abuse cases? 2. What degree of intermittent absenteeism is required before dismissal would be warranted? In certain other areas the tribunals have been fairly consistent and prescriptive in their approach and remedies awarded. Included here would be permanent incapacity, HIV cases and misconduct. It will emerge, however, that under the 1995 LRA the position of employees and the protections afforded them have been greatly increased.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2004
- Authors: Boy, Anthony Albert
- Date: 2004
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Capacity and disability -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:11047 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/316 , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Capacity and disability -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Description: Labour law in South Africa has evolved over the past century at an ever increasing pace. The establishment of a democratic government in 1995 has been the trigger for a large number of labour law statutes being promulgated, particularly with reference to the laws governing the employment relationship and dismissal. From very humble and employer biased dispute resolution application under the common law of contract, labour law in this country has evolved through the various acts culminating in a labour law system which is highly regulated and codified. Dismissal for medical incapacity in this treatise is reviewed with regard to the applicable statutes and the various codes of good practice as the law has evolved and developed from the period covered by the common law through that covered by the 1995 LRA up to and including the current period. Particular attention is paid to both substantive and procedural requirements as well as the remedies applicable under the different legal regimes and the pertinent tribunals and courts. Regard is also given to the duration and causes of incapacity and the effect this may have on the applicable remedy applied by these tribunals. It will become apparant that the medically incapacitated employee occupied a relatively weak and vulnerable position under the common law as opposed to the current position under the 1995 LRA. The influence of the remedies applied by the tribunals under the 1956 LRA are clearly evident in the current regulations and codes under the 1995 LRA which contain specific statutory provisions for employees not to be unfairly dismissed. Distinctions are drawn between permissible and impermissible dismissals, with medical incapacity falling under the former. v Furthermore, a distinction is drawn statutorily between permanent and temporary illhealth/ injury incapacity with detailed guidelines for substantive and procedural fairness requirements to be met by employers. The powers of the specialist tribunals (CCMA, Bargaining Councils and Labour Courts) are regulated by statutory provisions and deal with appropriate remedies (reinstatement and/or compensation) a wardable in appropriate circumstances. Certain specific areas nonetheless still remain problematic for these tribunals and hence questions that require clear direction from the drafters of our law are: 1. How to distinguish misconduct in alcohol and drug abuse cases? 2. What degree of intermittent absenteeism is required before dismissal would be warranted? In certain other areas the tribunals have been fairly consistent and prescriptive in their approach and remedies awarded. Included here would be permanent incapacity, HIV cases and misconduct. It will emerge, however, that under the 1995 LRA the position of employees and the protections afforded them have been greatly increased.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2004
Dismissal for medical incapacity
- Authors: Boy, Anthony Albert
- Date: 2004
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Capacity and disability -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10242 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1016262
- Description: Labour law in South Africa has evolved over the past century at an ever increasing pace. The establishment of a democratic government in 1995 has been the trigger for a large number of labour law statutes being promulgated, particularly with reference to the laws governing the employment relationship and dismissal. From very humble and employer biased dispute resolution application under the common law of contract, labour law in this country has evolved through the various acts culminating in a labour law system which is highly regulated and codified. Dismissal for medical incapacity in this treatise is reviewed with regard to the applicable statutes and the various codes of good practice as the law has evolved and developed from the period covered by the common law through that covered by the 1995 LRA up to and including the current period. Particular attention is paid to both substantive and procedural requirements as well as the remedies applicable under the different legal regimes and the pertinent tribunals and courts. Regard is also given to the duration and causes of incapacity and the effect this may have on the applicable remedy applied by these tribunals. It will become apparant that the medically incapacitated employee occupied a relatively weak and vulnerable position under the common law as opposed to the current position under the 1995 LRA. The influence of the remedies applied by the tribunals under the 1956 LRA are clearly evident in the current regulations and codes under the 1995 LRA which contain specific statutory provisions for employees not to be unfairly dismissed. Distinctions are drawn between permissible and impermissible dismissals, with medical incapacity falling under the former. Furthermore, a distinction is drawn statutorily between permanent and temporary illhealth/injury incapacity with detailed guidelines for substantive and procedural fairness requirements to be met by employers. The powers of the specialist tribunals (CCMA, Bargaining Councils and Labour Courts) are regulated by statutory provisions and deal with appropriate remedies (reinstatement and/or compensation) a wardable in appropriate circumstances. Certain specific areas nonetheless still remain problematic for these tribunals and hence questions that require clear direction from the drafters of our law are: How to distinguish misconduct in alcohol and drug abuse cases? What degree of intermittent absenteeism is required before dismissal would be warranted? In certain other areas the tribunals have been fairly consistent and prescriptive in their approach and remedies awarded. Included here would be permanent incapacity, HIV cases and misconduct. It will emerge, however, that under the 1995 LRA the position of employees and the protections afforded them have been greatly increased.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2004
- Authors: Boy, Anthony Albert
- Date: 2004
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Capacity and disability -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: vital:10242 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1016262
- Description: Labour law in South Africa has evolved over the past century at an ever increasing pace. The establishment of a democratic government in 1995 has been the trigger for a large number of labour law statutes being promulgated, particularly with reference to the laws governing the employment relationship and dismissal. From very humble and employer biased dispute resolution application under the common law of contract, labour law in this country has evolved through the various acts culminating in a labour law system which is highly regulated and codified. Dismissal for medical incapacity in this treatise is reviewed with regard to the applicable statutes and the various codes of good practice as the law has evolved and developed from the period covered by the common law through that covered by the 1995 LRA up to and including the current period. Particular attention is paid to both substantive and procedural requirements as well as the remedies applicable under the different legal regimes and the pertinent tribunals and courts. Regard is also given to the duration and causes of incapacity and the effect this may have on the applicable remedy applied by these tribunals. It will become apparant that the medically incapacitated employee occupied a relatively weak and vulnerable position under the common law as opposed to the current position under the 1995 LRA. The influence of the remedies applied by the tribunals under the 1956 LRA are clearly evident in the current regulations and codes under the 1995 LRA which contain specific statutory provisions for employees not to be unfairly dismissed. Distinctions are drawn between permissible and impermissible dismissals, with medical incapacity falling under the former. Furthermore, a distinction is drawn statutorily between permanent and temporary illhealth/injury incapacity with detailed guidelines for substantive and procedural fairness requirements to be met by employers. The powers of the specialist tribunals (CCMA, Bargaining Councils and Labour Courts) are regulated by statutory provisions and deal with appropriate remedies (reinstatement and/or compensation) a wardable in appropriate circumstances. Certain specific areas nonetheless still remain problematic for these tribunals and hence questions that require clear direction from the drafters of our law are: How to distinguish misconduct in alcohol and drug abuse cases? What degree of intermittent absenteeism is required before dismissal would be warranted? In certain other areas the tribunals have been fairly consistent and prescriptive in their approach and remedies awarded. Included here would be permanent incapacity, HIV cases and misconduct. It will emerge, however, that under the 1995 LRA the position of employees and the protections afforded them have been greatly increased.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2004
Dismissal for operational requirements in the context of collective bargaining
- Authors: Mfaxa, Mncedisi
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Collective bargaining -- South Africa , Collective bargaining -- Dismissal of Industrial relations -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/13923 , vital:27358
- Description: The highly competitive environment in which companies functions prompts the need to review their operations which may include reconsideration of the manning levels, and or changing terms and conditions of employment in order to be able to survive and prosper economically. The difficulty arises when the employers have to respond to the challenges. By law the employers are legally prohibited from unilaterally effecting the changes to the terms and conditions of employment. Furthermore, changing terms and conditions of employment is dealt with through collective bargaining and as such, the dismissal is outlawed as a legitimate instrument to coerce the employees to concede to the proposals. So the employers have to obtain an agreement or consent with the affected employees. In terms of the 1956 LRA the employer could justifiably terminate the contract of employment within the context of collective bargaining. For the employer to avoid offending the lock out provisions in terms of the 1956 LRA, the lock-out dismissal had to be effected in order to achieve a specific purpose, and it had to be conditional. Unlike its predecessor, the 1995 Labour Relations Act introduced section 187(1)(c) which renders the so-called lock-out dismissal by an employer, within the context of collective bargaining, automatically unfair. Section 187(1)(c) categorises a dismissal as automatically unfair, if the reason is a refusal by employees to accept a demand in respect of any matter of mutual interest between them and their employer. The employers are however permitted in terms of the 1995 LRA, to dismiss the employees based on operational grounds, as long as the requisite process has been adhered to. The employers need to restructure their operations in order to ensure that terms and conditions of employment are responsive to operational needs. Where the employees’ terms and conditions of employment are not in line with the company operational requirements, the need to terminate the employment contracts of the employees may arise. The employers are within their right to terminate the service of the employees who refuse to accept changes to their conditions of service based on the employers’ operational requirements. The court in Schoeman v Samsung Electronics confirmed that employer’s right to run its business in a successful manner, which includes affecting changes to the existing terms and conditions of employment to be aligned with the market demand. The dismissal is outlawed as a mechanism to coerce the employees to acceptance the employer’s demand relating to matters of mutual interest. At the same time, the employers are within their rights terminate the service of the employees who refuse to accept changes to their conditions of service based on the employers operational requirements. There is a clear tension between sections 187(1) (c), 188(1) (ii) and 189 of LRA. When the employers seek to review the terms and conditions of employment, the tension between these sections becomes more common, as it involves the matters of mutual interest which are dealt with through the collective bargaining arena and the dispute of right through arbitration. In Fry’s Metals v Numsa the court rejected the notion that there is tension between section 187(1) (c) and section 188(1) (a) (ii) of the LRA. Instead the court was of the view that, there is a historical context to section 187(1) (c) which is the now repealed 1956 Labour Relations Act. The 1956 LRA included in its definition of a lock-out the termination by the employer. Secondly, the court interpreted section 187(1)(C) to only give protection to employees who are dismissed in order to compel them to accept a demand on a matter of mutual interest, and only where the dismissal was of a temporary nature. The court interpretation in Fry’s metals implied that, section 187(1)(c) will only come to the defence of employees if they are dismissed for the purpose compelling them to accept a demand on a matter of mutual interest, and if the dismissal was of a temporary nature. Where a permanent dismissal is effected because employees would not accept its demands, section 187(1) (c) could not come to the employees’ protection. Considering that the lock out provided for in terms of the 1995 LRA is not a preferred option by most of the employers, they will rather resort to use the loophole created by the narrow interpretation of section 187(1)(c) to circumvent having to secure consensus from the affected employees and rather dismissed them based on operational requirements. This study seeks to deal with the questions relating to the relationship between collective bargaining related dismissals in particular the automatically unfair dismissal in terms of section 187(1) (c) and business restructuring related dismissal. As such the relationship between sections 187(1) (c) and dismissals based on operational requirements will be central to this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Mfaxa, Mncedisi
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Collective bargaining -- South Africa , Collective bargaining -- Dismissal of Industrial relations -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/13923 , vital:27358
- Description: The highly competitive environment in which companies functions prompts the need to review their operations which may include reconsideration of the manning levels, and or changing terms and conditions of employment in order to be able to survive and prosper economically. The difficulty arises when the employers have to respond to the challenges. By law the employers are legally prohibited from unilaterally effecting the changes to the terms and conditions of employment. Furthermore, changing terms and conditions of employment is dealt with through collective bargaining and as such, the dismissal is outlawed as a legitimate instrument to coerce the employees to concede to the proposals. So the employers have to obtain an agreement or consent with the affected employees. In terms of the 1956 LRA the employer could justifiably terminate the contract of employment within the context of collective bargaining. For the employer to avoid offending the lock out provisions in terms of the 1956 LRA, the lock-out dismissal had to be effected in order to achieve a specific purpose, and it had to be conditional. Unlike its predecessor, the 1995 Labour Relations Act introduced section 187(1)(c) which renders the so-called lock-out dismissal by an employer, within the context of collective bargaining, automatically unfair. Section 187(1)(c) categorises a dismissal as automatically unfair, if the reason is a refusal by employees to accept a demand in respect of any matter of mutual interest between them and their employer. The employers are however permitted in terms of the 1995 LRA, to dismiss the employees based on operational grounds, as long as the requisite process has been adhered to. The employers need to restructure their operations in order to ensure that terms and conditions of employment are responsive to operational needs. Where the employees’ terms and conditions of employment are not in line with the company operational requirements, the need to terminate the employment contracts of the employees may arise. The employers are within their right to terminate the service of the employees who refuse to accept changes to their conditions of service based on the employers’ operational requirements. The court in Schoeman v Samsung Electronics confirmed that employer’s right to run its business in a successful manner, which includes affecting changes to the existing terms and conditions of employment to be aligned with the market demand. The dismissal is outlawed as a mechanism to coerce the employees to acceptance the employer’s demand relating to matters of mutual interest. At the same time, the employers are within their rights terminate the service of the employees who refuse to accept changes to their conditions of service based on the employers operational requirements. There is a clear tension between sections 187(1) (c), 188(1) (ii) and 189 of LRA. When the employers seek to review the terms and conditions of employment, the tension between these sections becomes more common, as it involves the matters of mutual interest which are dealt with through the collective bargaining arena and the dispute of right through arbitration. In Fry’s Metals v Numsa the court rejected the notion that there is tension between section 187(1) (c) and section 188(1) (a) (ii) of the LRA. Instead the court was of the view that, there is a historical context to section 187(1) (c) which is the now repealed 1956 Labour Relations Act. The 1956 LRA included in its definition of a lock-out the termination by the employer. Secondly, the court interpreted section 187(1)(C) to only give protection to employees who are dismissed in order to compel them to accept a demand on a matter of mutual interest, and only where the dismissal was of a temporary nature. The court interpretation in Fry’s metals implied that, section 187(1)(c) will only come to the defence of employees if they are dismissed for the purpose compelling them to accept a demand on a matter of mutual interest, and if the dismissal was of a temporary nature. Where a permanent dismissal is effected because employees would not accept its demands, section 187(1) (c) could not come to the employees’ protection. Considering that the lock out provided for in terms of the 1995 LRA is not a preferred option by most of the employers, they will rather resort to use the loophole created by the narrow interpretation of section 187(1)(c) to circumvent having to secure consensus from the affected employees and rather dismissed them based on operational requirements. This study seeks to deal with the questions relating to the relationship between collective bargaining related dismissals in particular the automatically unfair dismissal in terms of section 187(1) (c) and business restructuring related dismissal. As such the relationship between sections 187(1) (c) and dismissals based on operational requirements will be central to this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Dismissal for racist remarks and racism
- Authors: Du Plessis, Armand
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47359 , vital:39850
- Description: Racism has always been a hard and tough battle fought by all South Africans. Since the independence of the Republic of South Africa has racism in the workplace become a very popular tendency. Ever since has there been a number of legislation which has been incorporated to specifically address this behaviour, but remains the question whether this legislation has achieved what its drafters aimed to have achieved. There will also be a comparison to the implemented legislations of Australia and England aimed at addressing and prohibiting racism in the workplace. Throughout this study, attention will be brought to specific words which have been used in the past by particular employees towards their fellow employees and the consequences thereof. Recently, the Supreme Court of Appeal and our Constitutional Court had to relook at the definition of “hate speech” in terms of certain legislation within South African and came to the conclusion that this definition must be amended to include, and also exclude, particular words and phrases in order for the existing definition thereof to be more precise and clear. The main aim of this study is to determine whether the dismissal of an employee, based on racism in the workplace, or for the utter of racism remarks in the workplace, can warrant the dismissal of that specific employee, and should dismissal not be the appropriate sanction, to determine what sanction would be appropriate in such circumstances. The writer hereof, has aspired to achieve his goal throughout this study that racism in the workplace should not be tolerated, and that employees who make themselves guilty thereof, should be punished in a serious manner.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Du Plessis, Armand
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47359 , vital:39850
- Description: Racism has always been a hard and tough battle fought by all South Africans. Since the independence of the Republic of South Africa has racism in the workplace become a very popular tendency. Ever since has there been a number of legislation which has been incorporated to specifically address this behaviour, but remains the question whether this legislation has achieved what its drafters aimed to have achieved. There will also be a comparison to the implemented legislations of Australia and England aimed at addressing and prohibiting racism in the workplace. Throughout this study, attention will be brought to specific words which have been used in the past by particular employees towards their fellow employees and the consequences thereof. Recently, the Supreme Court of Appeal and our Constitutional Court had to relook at the definition of “hate speech” in terms of certain legislation within South African and came to the conclusion that this definition must be amended to include, and also exclude, particular words and phrases in order for the existing definition thereof to be more precise and clear. The main aim of this study is to determine whether the dismissal of an employee, based on racism in the workplace, or for the utter of racism remarks in the workplace, can warrant the dismissal of that specific employee, and should dismissal not be the appropriate sanction, to determine what sanction would be appropriate in such circumstances. The writer hereof, has aspired to achieve his goal throughout this study that racism in the workplace should not be tolerated, and that employees who make themselves guilty thereof, should be punished in a serious manner.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020